Cases 11 - 19 of 19
TOMASZFSKI et al v. T&N LIMITED et al
as 3:2013cv07547
Plaintiff:
DOLORES B. TOMASZFSKI and THE FEDERAL-MOGUL ASBESTOS PERSONAL INJURY TRUST
Defendant:
T&N LIMITED and TAF INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
QUINN et al v. T&N LIMITED et al
as 3:2013cv07540
Plaintiff:
JOHN R. QUINN, JR. and THE FEDERAL-MOGUL ASBESTOS PERSONAL INJURY TRUST
Defendant:
T&N LIMITED and TAF INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BRADLEY et al v. T&N LIMITED et al
as 3:2013cv07532
Plaintiff:
JOYCE BRADLEY and THE FEDERAL-MOGUL ASBESTOS PERSONAL INJURY TRUST
Defendant:
T&N LIMITED and TAF INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TRAVIS et al v. T&N LIMITED et al
as 3:2013cv07557
Plaintiff:
SUSAN N. TRAVIS and THE FEDERAL-MOGUL ASBESTOS PERSONAL INJURY TRUST
Defendant:
T&N LIMITED and TAF INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DUGGAN et al v. T&N LIMITED et al
as 3:2013cv07554
Plaintiff:
JOHN J. DUGGAN and THE FEDERAL-MOGUL ASBESTOS PERSONAL INJURY TRUST
Defendant:
T&N LIMITED and TAF INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00986
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00032
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Movant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00876
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Movant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Creditor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
VINCENT v. AMOCO SHIPPING COMPANY et al
as 2:2007cv73937
Plaintiff:
ALCIDE VINCENT, JR and ALCIDE VINCENT, JR
Defendant:
AMOCO SHIPPING COMPANY, CHEVRON USA INC, LYKES BROTHERS STEAMSHIP COMPANY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
