Cases 21 - 30 of 33
Powers v. Campbell Soup Company et al
as 1:2013cv07663
Plaintiff:
Timothy Powers
Defendant:
CAMPBELL SOUP COMPANY and AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
WALDRON v. CAMPBELL SOUP COMPANY et al
as 1:2013cv05015
Plaintiff:
JAMES WALDRON
Defendant:
CAMPBELL SOUP COMPANY and AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION, INC.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3731
O'SHEA v. CAMPBELL SOUP COMPANY et al
as 1:2013cv04887
Plaintiff:
KERRY O'SHEA
Defendant:
CAMPBELL SOUP COMPANY and AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RUIZ v. CAMPBELL SOUP COMPANY et al
as 1:2013cv02634
Plaintiff:
JOE RUIZ
Defendant:
CAMPBELL SOUP COMPANY and CAMPBELL SOUP COMPANY SEVERANCE PAY PLAN FOR SALARIED EMPLOYEES
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
PEPPERIDGE FARM, INCORPORATED et al v. FOSTER
as 1:2013cv01606
Plaintiff:
PEPPERIDGE FARM, INCORPORATED and CAMPBELL SOUP COMPANY
Defendant:
PAUL FOSTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
CSC BRANDS LP et al v. CHICKEN SOUP FOR THE SOUL PUBLISHING, LLC et al
as 1:2012cv06569
Plaintiff:
CSC BRANDS LP and CAMPBELL SOUP COMPANY
Defendant:
CHICKEN SOUP FOR THE SOUL PUBLISHING, LLC , CHICKEN SOUP FOR THE SOUL FOODS LLC and DAYMON WORLDWIDE INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Trademark
RUIZ v. CAMPBELL SOUP COMPANY
as 1:2012cv06131
Plaintiff:
JOE RUIZ
Defendant:
CAMPBELL SOUP COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1362 ERISA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv05581
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SMAJLAJ v. CAMPBELL SOUP COMPANY
as 1:2010cv01332
Plaintiff:
ROSA SMAJLAJ
Defendant:
CAMPBELL SOUP COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv03106
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
