Cases 21 - 30 of 126
Melbourne v. Sabol et al
as 4:2008cv01048
Petitioner:
Wallace Melbourne
Respondent:
Mary Sabol and Donald Monica
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Leites v. Lowe et al
as 3:2008cv00845
Petitioner:
Jose Lora Leites
Respondent:
Craig Lowe and Donald Monica
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
MEGDOUD v. MUELLER et al
as 2:2008cv01916
Plaintiff:
KARIM MEGDOUD
Defendant:
ROBERT S. MUELLER, UNKNOWN US FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AGENCY OR AGENCIES, MICHAEL CHERTOFF and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00750
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
GOLDBERG v. MUKASEY et al
as 2:2008cv01371
Petitioner:
FELIX GOLDBERG
Respondent:
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, EDUARDO AGUIRRE, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
ZELAZO v. CHERTOFF et al
as 5:2008cv01183
Plaintiff:
MALGORZATA ZELAZO
Defendant:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, EMILIO T. GONZALEZ, EVELYN UPCHURCH and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Thomas v. Hogan et al
as 1:2008cv00417
Petitioner:
Omar Thomas
Respondent:
Thomas Hogan and Donald Monica
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (IMMIGRATION)
AUGUSTINE v. MUKASEY et al
as 2:2008cv01098
Petitioner:
BIJUMON K. AUGUSTINE
Respondent:
MICHAEL MUKASEY, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, EMILIO T. GONZALEZ and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
SHEN et al v. CHERTOFF et al
as 2:2008cv01014
Plaintiff:
QING SHEN, WEN FENG SUN and ZI XUAN SHEN
Defendant:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, EMILIO T. GONZALEZ, EVELYN UPCHURCH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00347
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
