Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv05991
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Scherer v. Lu et al
as 1:2013cv00358
Plaintiff:
Marsha Scherer
Defendant:
Keh-Shew Lu , Raymond Soong , C.H. Chen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Conversion
UBIQUITI NETWORKS, INC. v. KOZUMI USA CORP. et al
as 1:2012cv07154
Plaintiff:
UBIQUITI NETWORKS, INC.
Defendant:
KOZUMI USA CORP., SHAO WEI HSU, LILIA KUNG and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
HOWARD JOHNSON INTERNATIONAL, INC. v. HSU
as 2:2011cv01324
Plaintiff:
HOWARD JOHNSON INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Defendant:
STEVE HSU
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LIN v. HSU et al
as 2:2010cv05967
Plaintiff:
HONG LIANG LIN
Defendant:
CONNIE HSU and L&H RESTAURANT INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
HOWARD JOHNSON INTERNATIONAL, INC. v. SAN ANGELO INN, LP et al
as 2:2010cv05127
Plaintiff:
HOWARD JOHNSON INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Defendant:
SAN ANGELO INN, LP and GEORGE HSU
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00622
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA
Li Yuan, et al v. Atty Gen USA
as 10-1082
Petitioner:
LI HUA YUAN, A/K/A Shu Chen Hsu and ZHOUGUI NI
Respondent:
ATTY GEN USA
Hsu v. Great Seneca Fin Corp, et al
as 09-4058
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LIFENG LEE HSU
Defendant - Non-Participating:
WOLPOFF & ABRAMSON, GREAT SENECA FIN CORP and PALISADES ACQUISTION XVI LLC
Defendant - Appellee:
FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP and NEAL J. LEVITSKY
Hsu v. Wolpoff & Abramson L.L.P. et al
as 1:2008cv00293
Plaintiff:
Lifeng Lee Hsu
Defendant:
Wolpoff & Abramson L.L.P., Great Seneca Financial Corp., Palisades Acquistion XVI LLC and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
