Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 368
Carriveau v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2013cv00198
Plaintiff: Donna Carriveau
Defendant: 3M Company, 84 Lumber Company , Borg Warner Corporation and others
Cross_claimant: 84 Lumber Company , Union Carbide Corporation, Certainteed Corporation and others
Cross_defendant: 84 Lumber Company , 3M Company, Borg Warner Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Asbestos Litigation
CARR et al v. CRANE COMPANY et al
as 2:2013cv00021
Plaintiff: CHARLES W. CARR and LORRAINE CARR
Defendant: CRANE COMPANY , JOHN CRANE, INC., AIR AND LIQUID SYSTEMS CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Asbestos Litigation
McCrocklin et al v. 84 Lumber Company et al
as 1:2012cv01483
Plaintiff: William M. McCrocklin and Judith M. McCrocklin
Defendant: 84 Lumber Company, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, American Biltrite Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Asbestos Litigation
MOSKOWITZ v. CRANE CO. et al
as 2:2012cv60192
Plaintiff: GLORIA MOSKOWITZ
Defendant: CRANE CO. , A.O. SMITH WARER PRODUCTS CO., AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION and others
Cross_claimant: AMERICAN BILTRITE, INC., CARRIER CORPORATION, AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC. and others
Cross_defendant: AMERICAN BILTRITE, INC., , A.O. SMITH WARER PRODUCTS CO., AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION and others
Respondent: CLYDE UNION, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
TUCKFELT et al v. CRANE CO. et al
as 2:2012cv60194
Plaintiff: SONDRA M. TUCKFELT and MARK TUCKFELT
Defendant: CRANE CO. , A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION and others
Cross_claimant: AMERICAN BILTRITE INC. and CARRIER CORPORATION
Cross_defendant: AMERICAN BILTRITE INC., A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Oates et al v. AO Smith Corporation et al
as 1:2012cv01229
Plaintiff: Robert Oates, Sr. and Emmaline Oates
Defendant: AO Smith Corporation, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, American Biltrite Inc. and others
Cross_claimant: Peerless Industries Inc. , Compudyne Corporation , Kentile Floors Inc. and others
Cross_defendant: Peerless Industries Inc. , AO Smith Corporation, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Patterson Mims et al v. 84 Lumber Company et al
as 1:2012cv01227
Defendant: American Biltrite Inc., CNH America LLC, HB Smith Company Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Patterson Mims and Vera Mims
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Davis et al v. Ace Hardware Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv01185
Defendant: BorgWarner Morse Tec Inc., Georgia Pacific LLC, Honeywell International Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Harry A. Davis and Madonna S. Davis
Cross Defendant: Peerless Industries
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Asbestos Litigation
Blake et al v. 84 Lumber Company et al
as 1:2012cv01174
Defendant: CBS Corporation, Cleaver-Brooks Inc., Georgia Pacific LLC and others
Cross Defendant: Soco-West Inc., Trane US Inc., American Honda Motor Co. Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Barbara Blake, Rufus Blake and Michael Blake
Cross Claimant: Advance Auto Parts Inc., Boeing Co., Eaton Corporation and others
Counter Defendant: FMC Corporation, General Electric Company and Mannington Mills Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Asbestos Litigation
HOLZWORTH v. ALFA LAVAL, INC. et al
as 2:2012cv60187
Plaintiff: WILLIAM ANDREW HOLZWORTH
Defendant: ALFA LAVAL, INC., AMERICAN BILTRITE, INC. , ARMSTRONG INTERNATIONAL, INC. and others
Cross_claimant: CARRIER COMPANY and WARREN PUMPS, INC.
Cross_defendant: CARRIER COMPANY , ALFA LAVAL, INC., AMERICAN BILTRITE, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?