Cases 21 - 27 of 27
WHELCHEL et al v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC
as 2:2012cv00389
Plaintiff:
ROBERT M. WHELCHEL and KARMA L. WHELCHEL
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
REYES et al v. JEFF D'AMBROSIO CHEVROLET GMC et al
as 2:2011cv01828
Plaintiff:
MARIA REYES , MIGUEL REYES and NILDA REYES
Defendant:
JEFF D'AMBROSIO CHEVROLET GMC , DONNA M. URBAN , SANTANDER CONSUMER USA and others
Cross_claimant:
JOHN DOE REPO-MAN 1 , JOHN DOE REPO-MAN 2 and KARMA RECOVERY II
Cross_defendant:
JOHN DOE REPO-MAN 1 , JOHN DOE REPO-MAN 2 , KARMA RECOVERY II and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
KARMA v. AFRICAN AMERICAN BUILDERS et al
as 3:2010cv04628
Plaintiff:
ABDUL R. KARMA
Defendant:
AFRICAN AMERICAN BUILDERS, FOFANA'S HOME IMPROVEMENT, IDRISA FOFANA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ACCOR FRANCHISING NORTH AMERICA, LLC et al v. KARMA HOLDINGS, LLC et al
as 2:2010cv04153
Plaintiff:
ACCOR FRANCHISING NORTH AMERICA, LLC , ACCOR NORTH AMERICA, INC. and MOTEL 6 OPERATING L.P.
Defendant:
KARMA HOLDINGS, LLC, BHARTI PATEL, PENROSE MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
The Hershey Company v. Karma Candy Inc.
as 1:2010cv00557
Plaintiff:
The Hershey Company
Defendant:
Karma Candy Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
The Hershey Company v. Karma Candy Inc.
as 1:2009cv01160
Plaintiff:
The Hershey Company
Defendant:
Karma Candy Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
HENSLEY et al v. AQUA-CHEM, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv84572
Plaintiff:
JOE FRANKLIN HENSLEY and KARMA JANE HENSLEY
Defendant:
AQUA-CHEM, INC., BORG-WARNER MORSE TEC, INC., CERTAINTEED CORPORATION and others
Cross Claimant:
A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY
Cross Defendant:
GENERAL REFRACTORIES COMPANY, GEORGIA PACIFIC CORPORATION, NATIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
