Cases 21 - 30 of 427,837
Janda v. Harry et al
as 3:2024cv01075
Plaintiff:
Ronald Janda
Defendant:
Laurel Harry, John Wetzel (Retired), Lawrence Mahally (Retired) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Neitz
as 4:2024cv01076
Plaintiff:
Adam Joseph Brown
Defendant:
Lieutenant Neitz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2024cv01077
Plaintiff:
Kimberly J. Thomas
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
VAZQUEZ et al v. NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2024cv02872
Plaintiff:
GEORGE VAZQUEZ and MARIA VAZQUEZ
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
KRATZ v. LM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2024cv02871
Plaintiff:
PEGGY J. KRATZ
Defendant:
LM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635 Breach of Insurance Contract
Laspino v. Federal Express Corporation
as 2:2024cv02874
Plaintiff:
Marc Laspino
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Stoddart v. Federal Express Corporation
as 5:2024cv02873
Plaintiff:
Jordan Stoddart
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
STRANGER v. Walmart Supercenter #2208 et al
as 2:2024cv02870
Plaintiff:
LEZLEE STRANGER
Defendant:
Walmart Supercenter #2208, Wal-Mart, Walmart, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
HOLLIS v. CENCORA, INC. et al
as 2:2024cv02863
Plaintiff:
JOHN HOLLIS
Defendant:
CENCORA, INC. and THE LASH GROUP, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
LANG v. WALMART SUPERCENTER et al
as 2:2024cv02867
Plaintiff:
JORDAN LANG
Defendant:
WALMART SUPERCENTER, WALMART STORES, INC. and WALMART STORE #2368
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
