Cases 31 - 40 of 45
ESTEFANOS et al v. CHERTOFF et al
as 2:2007cv02119
Plaintiff:
SAMIR ESTEFANOS and WESAM ESTEFANOS
Defendant:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, EMILIO GONZALEZ, PAUL NOVAK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
CHEN et al v. ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
as 3:2007cv02154
Plaintiff:
JINGDONG CHEN and SHAOYAN CHEN
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, EMILIO GONZALEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv01797
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv01659
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
PERLOV v. CHERTOFF et al
as 2:2007cv01637
Petitioner:
DAN PERLOV
Respondent:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, EMILIO GONZALEZ, ALBERTO GONZALES and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv01543
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv01139
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv00874
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
HUANG v. GONZALES et al
as 2:2007cv00860
Plaintiff:
CHENGUANG HUANG
Defendant:
ALBERTO GONZALES, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, EMILIO GONZALEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv00851
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
