Cases 31 - 40 of 43
Hooker v. Stone
as 1:2008cv00883
Petitioner:
Henry Hooker, Jr.
Respondent:
Dan Stone
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hooker v. Chief Oil & Gas et al
as 4:2008cv02091
Plaintiff:
Andrew Hooker
Defendant:
Chief Oil & Gas, Radler 2000 LP, MK Resource Partners II, L.P. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Hooker v. Bayer Corporation et al
as 1:2008cv00651
Defendant:
Bayer Corporation, Bayer Healthcare LLC, Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Carter L. Hooker III
Cause Of Action: Diversity
HOOKER v. MONSANTO COMPANY et al
as 2:2008cv79302
Plaintiff:
BOBBY E. HOOKER
Defendant:
MONSANTO COMPANY, GARLOCK, INC., GULF BELTING & GASKET CO., INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
HOOKER v. TYCO INTERNATIONAL (U.S.) INC. et al
as 2:2008cv77678
Plaintiff:
HAZEL HOOKER
Defendant:
TYCO INTERNATIONAL (U.S.) INC., TYCO INTERNATIONAL (U.S.) INC., TYCO INTERNATIONAL (U.S.) INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
HOOKER v. 3M, ET AL.
as 2:2008cv74805
Plaintiff:
DOREEN LIPFORD HOOKER
Defendant:
3M, A-BEX CORPORATION, A.K. STEEL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
HOOKER v. MINNESOTA MINING & MANUFACTURING CO. et al
as 2:2008cv69681
Plaintiff:
EDDIE HOOKER
Defendant:
MINNESOTA MINING & MANUFACTURING CO., AMERICAN OPITCAL CORPORATION, THE BENDIX CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
HOOKER v. OWENS-ILLINOIS
as 2:2008cv67568
Plaintiff:
MATTIE HOOKER
Defendant:
OWENS-ILLINOIS
Cause Of Action: Diversity
HOOKER v. ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2008cv64572
Plaintiff:
EDWARD HOOKER and EDWARD HOOKER
Defendant:
ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
LOONEY et al v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO
as 2:2007cv73790
Plaintiff:
HARVEY HOOKER LOONEY and ROBERT ANTHONY SCOTT, SR
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
