Cases 31 - 40 of 55
ALEGRIA v. HOLLINGSWORTH
as 1:2012cv07927
Petitioner:
SANDRO MANTILLA ALEGRIA
Respondent:
JORDAN R. HOLLINGSWORTH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
LUCHI v. HOLLINGSWORTH
as 1:2012cv07888
Petitioner:
EPIFANIO MATOS LUCHI
Respondent:
JORDAN R. HOLLINGSWORTH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
EL SHERIFF v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2012cv07887
Petitioner:
KHALID (DAVID) EL SHERIFF
Respondent:
ERIC HOLDER, JANET NAPOLITANO, STEVEN BRANCH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
ARROYO v. HOLLINGSWORTH
as 1:2012cv07889
Petitioner:
PAULINO SOLIMAN ARROYO
Respondent:
JORDAN R. HOLLINGSWORTH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
CASTILLO v. HOLLINGSWORTH
as 1:2012cv07831
Petitioner:
JORGE MATUTE CASTILLO
Respondent:
JORDAN R. HOLLINGSWORTH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
PEREZ-MEJIAS v. HOLLINGSWORTH
as 1:2012cv07836
Petitioner:
RAMON PEREZ-MEJIAS
Respondent:
JORDAN R. HOLLINGSWORTH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
AREVALO v. HOLLINGSWORTH
as 1:2012cv07832
Petitioner:
JOFRE A. PLAZA AREVALO
Respondent:
JORDAN R. HOLLINGSWORTH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
DAVIS v. HOLLINGSWORTH
as 1:2012cv07830
Petitioner:
LORME KELLY DAVIS
Respondent:
JORDAN R. HOLLINGSWORTH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
PAREDES v. HOLLINGSWORTH
as 1:2012cv07834
Petitioner:
BUENERGI ESTUPINA PAREDES
Respondent:
JORDAN R. HOLLINGSWORTH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SANTOS v. HOLLINGSWORTH
as 1:2012cv07778
Petitioner:
GERARDO MATUTE SANTOS
Respondent:
JORDAN R. HOLLINGSWORTH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.