Cases 41 - 50 of 1,480
Philips v. P&F Industries, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01365
Plaintiff:
Mary Philips
Defendant:
P&F Industries, Inc., Kenneth M. Scheriff, Mitchell A. Solomon and others
Elad v. Truist Bank et al
as 1:2023cv01360
Plaintiff:
Joseph B. Elad
Defendant:
Truist Bank, Joshua Collins, Ballard Spahr LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gagliardino v. Pinkerton Consulting and Investigations
as 1:2023cv01358
Plaintiff:
Jonathan M. Gagliardino
Defendant:
Pinkerton Consulting and Investigations
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Shipoil Limited v. M/V MARIT SELMER, IMO No. 9609706
as 1:2023cv01355
Plaintiff:
Shipoil Limited
Defendant:
M/V MARIT SELMER, IMO No. 9609706
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Bhavsar et al v. Fruchterman et al
as 1:2023cv01356
Nominal Defendant:
Butterfly Network, Inc. and Longview Acquisition Corporation I
Plaintiff:
Denish Bhavsar and Samhita Gera
Defendant:
Todd M. Fruchterman, Stephanie Fielding, Jonathan M. Rothberg and others
Keritsis v. Hayes et al
as 1:2023cv01351
Nominal Defendant:
RTX Corporation and Raytheon Technologies Corporation
Plaintiff:
George Keritsis
Defendant:
Gregory Hayes, Tracy A. Atkinson, Leanne G. Caret and others
O'Neill v. Neoleukin Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01310
Plaintiff:
James O'Neill
Defendant:
Neoleukin Therapeutics, Inc., Martin Babler, M. Cantey Boyd and others
Williams v. Neoleukin Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01306
Plaintiff:
Robert Williams
Defendant:
Neoleukin Therapeutics, Inc., Martin Babler, M. Cantey Boyd and others
Walsh v. PCTEL, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01294
Plaintiff:
Ryan Walsh
Defendant:
PCTEL, Inc., M. Jay Sinder, Cindy Andreotti and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01288
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Religion)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
