Cases 41 - 50 of 110
Christian v. Commonwealth of PA et al
as 3:2014cv00079
Petitioner:
Julio Christian
Respondent:
Commonwealth of PA and Attorney General of PA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pope v. Wingard et al
as 3:2014cv00109
Petitioner:
Bob Pope
Respondent:
Trevor Wingard and Attorney General of PA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Montanez v. Kerestes et al
as 3:2013cv02964
Petitioner:
Rivera Francisco Montanez
Respondent:
John Kerestes and Attorney General of PA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
KELLAM v. KERESTES et al
as 2:2013cv06392
Petitioner:
KAREEM KELLAM
Respondent:
JOHN KERESTES and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rowe v. Giroux et al
as 3:2013cv02444
Petitioner:
Gregory Alan Rowe
Respondent:
Nancy Giroux and Attorney General of PA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kellam v. Kerestes et al
as 3:2013cv02199
Petitioner:
Kareem Kellam
Respondent:
John Kerestes and Attorney General of PA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kimbrough v. Giroux et al
as 3:2013cv02119
Petitioner:
Darrell Kimbrough
Respondent:
Nancy Giroux , Attorney General of PA and District Attorney for Lackawanna County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cangiarella v. Wenerowicz et al
as 3:2013cv02121
Petitioner:
Dennis Anthony Cangiarella
Respondent:
Mike Wenerowicz and Attorney General of PA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Suarez v. Kerestes et al
as 3:2013cv02004
Petitioner:
Thomas Suarez
Respondent:
John Kerestes and Attorney General of PA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2013cv01673
Petitioner:
Brandon Thomas Brown
Respondent:
John Wetzel, Daniel Burns and Attorney General of PA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
