Cases 41 - 50 of 207
James Smith v. George Hayman, et al
as 12-2203
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES R. SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
GEORGE HAYMAN, Commissioner of the New Jersey Department of Corrections (NJDOC), MICHELLE RICCI, Administrator of New Jersey State Prison (NJSP), RUSTY REEVES, Doctor, Director of Psychiatry and others
Angelo Burgos v. Michelle Ricci, et al
as 12-2044
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANGELO BURGOS
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHELLE RICCI and ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY
Paul Coomer v. Governor of the State of New J, et al
as 12-1895
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUL EDWARD COOMER
Defendant - Appellee:
GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, GEORGE HAYMAN, MICHELLE RICCI and others
Alexis DeJesus v. Michelle Ricci, et al
as 12-1879
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALEXIS DEJESUS
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHELLE RICCI and ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY
Boris Boretsky v. Michelle Ricci, et al
as 12-1707
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BORIS BORETSKY
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHELLE RICCI, N.J.S.P. Administrator and ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY
Paul Chisolm v. Michelle Ricci, et al
as 12-1585
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUL CHISOLM
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHELLE RICCI and ANNE MILGRAM
Clayton Webster v. Michelle Ricci, et al
as 12-1566
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLAYTON WEBSTER
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHELLE RICCI and ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY
Bayete v. Ricci, et al
as 12-1372
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KOFI BAYETE
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHELLE RICCI, Administrator of New Jersey State Prison, DONALD MEE, Associate Administrator of New Jersey State Prison, ALLAN MARTIN, Medical Doctor and others
Steven St. Fleur v. Michelle Ricci
as 12-1317
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVEN ST. FLEUR
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHELLE RICCI and ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY
Dana Tokley v. Michelle Ricci, et al
as 12-1307
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANA T. TOKLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHELLE RICCI and ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
