Cases 41 - 50 of 389
NEAL v. AVILES et al
as 2:2022cv05574
Plaintiff:
RODNEY NEAL
Defendant:
OSCAR AVILES and NURSE WINT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WHITFIELD v. HUDSON COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 2:2022cv06426
Plaintiff:
STEPHON L. WHITFIELD
Defendant:
HUDSON COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, OSCAR AVILES and WELL PATH MEDICAL DEPT.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANDINO v. HUDSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION
as 2:2022cv05706
Plaintiff:
EDWIN ANDINO, JR.
Defendant:
HUDSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION and ACTING WARDEN OSCAR AVILES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JACKSON v. AVILES
as 2:2022cv06388
Plaintiff:
JAHLIL D. JACKSON
Defendant:
OSCAR AVILES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BONNER v. WARREN et al
as 1:2022cv06130
Plaintiff:
CHRISTAPHER A. BONNER, SR.
Defendant:
CHARLES WARREN and OSCAR AVILES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CAMPBELL v. AVILES
as 2:2022cv06238
Plaintiff:
DANIEL CAMPBELL
Defendant:
OSCAR AVILES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. HUDSON COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 2:2022cv06240
Plaintiff:
DARNELL BROWN
Defendant:
HUDSON COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and OSCAR AVILES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARQUEZ v. AVILES
as 2:2022cv06239
Plaintiff:
HECTOR MARQUEZ
Defendant:
OSCAR AVILES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SYKES v. AVILES et al
as 2:2022cv05071
Plaintiff:
DASHAWN N. SYKES
Defendant:
MR. OSCAR AVILES, MEDICAL DIRECTOR and MICHEAL DANTICO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANDERSON v. AVILES et al
as 2:2022cv05269
Plaintiff:
MR. EMMANUEL T ANDERSON
Defendant:
MR. OSCAR AVILES, MR. MICHAEL DANTICO and HUDSON COUNTY FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
