Cases 51 - 60 of 71
VOELKER v. DOLLAR TREE et al
as 2:2010cv06741
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM VOELKER, JR.
Defendant:
DOLLAR TREE and DOLLAR TREE STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RENTZELL v. DOLLAR TREE STORES, INC.
as 5:2010cv04270
Plaintiff:
RALPH F. RENTZELL
Defendant:
DOLLAR TREE STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KING v. DOLLAR TREE STORE, INC.
as 2:2010cv04212
Plaintiff:
BERNARD KING
Defendant:
DOLLAR TREE STORE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FLEMING et al v. DOLLAR TREE STORES, INC.
as 5:2010cv03287
Plaintiff:
GERTRUDE FLEMING and MARKLEY FLEMING
Defendant:
DOLLAR TREE STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NELSON-HURST v. DOLLAR TREE STORES, INC.
as 2:2010cv02477
Plaintiff:
THEODORA NELSON-HURST
Defendant:
DOLLAR TREE STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BUFFINGTON et al v. DOLLAR TREE STORES, INC. et al
as 1:2010cv00749
Plaintiff:
CARRIE BUFFINGTON and LESTER BUFFINGTON, SR.
Defendant:
DOLLAR TREE STORES, INC. , M & E ASSOCIATES, JOHN DOE 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
BIANCELLA v. DOLLAR TREE STORES, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv00802
Plaintiff:
ROSE BIANCELLA
Defendant:
DOLLAR TREE STORES, INC. , JOHN DOES NOS. 1-3 and ABC CORP. NOS. 1-3,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
PATTERSON v. DOLLAR TREE STORES, INC.
as 2:2009cv04446
Plaintiff:
TONIE PATTERSON
Defendant:
DOLLAR TREE STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
SUN HILL INDUSTRIES, INC. v. DOLLAR TREE STORES, INC.
as 2:2009cv04473
Plaintiff:
SUN HILL INDUSTRIES, INC.
Defendant:
DOLLAR TREE STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
ALVARADO v. DOLLAR TREE STORES, INC.
as 2:2009cv03165
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER ALVARADO
Defendant:
DOLLAR TREE STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
