Cases 51 - 60 of 125
CUNNINGHAM v. HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.
as 3:2018cv15129
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-10, THE HOME DEPOT, INC., ABC CORPORATION 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA CUNNINGHAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
COHEN v. THE HOME DEPOT et al
as 1:2018cv14107
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-10 (fictitious designations), XYZ ENTITIES 1-10, ABC CORPORATIONS 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
MITCHELL I COHEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv12863
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
GORDON v. HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC. et al
as 3:2018cv08809
Plaintiff:
LYNN GORDON
Defendant:
HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC. , DOLLAR TREE, ABC LANDLORD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
PRESCOD v. HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.
as 2:2018cv08766
Plaintiff:
DAYNA PRESCOD
Defendant:
HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC. , JOHN DOES 1-10 and ABC CORPS 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
GOUDELIS v. HOME DEPOT U.S.A, INC.
as 2:2018cv06691
Plaintiff:
IRENE GOUDELIS
Defendant:
HOME DEPOT U.S.A, INC. , KARCHER NORTH AMERICA, INC., JOHN DOE (1-100) and others
Cross_claimant:
HOME DEPOT U.S.A, INC.
Cross_defendant:
JOHN DOE (1-100), KARCHER NORTH AMERICA, INC. and XYZ CORPORATION (1-100)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
GOUDELIS v. HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC
as 2:2018cv06680
Plaintiff:
IRENE GOUDELIS
Defendant:
HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv02097
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LESTER v. HOME DEPOT U.S.A. INC.
as 2:2018cv02018
Defendant:
HOME DEPOT U.S.A. INC.
Plaintiff:
ROGER LESTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BROCK v. BEHR PROCESS CORP. et al
as 2:2017cv12341
Plaintiff:
BARRY BROCK
Defendant:
BEHR PROCESS CORP., BEHR PAINT CORP., MASCO CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
