Cases 51 - 57 of 57
TEMPLETON v. MONSANTO COMPANY et al
as 2:2008cv79511
Plaintiff:
GAYLE TEMPLETON
Defendant:
MONSANTO COMPANY, GARLOCK, INC., GULF BELTING & GASKET CO., INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
TEMPLETON v. 3M, ET AL.
as 2:2008cv76806
Plaintiff:
ROY LEE TEMPLETON
Defendant:
3M, A-BEX CORPORATION, A.K. STEEL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
BEALE v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE et al
as 1:2008cv00965
Plaintiff:
CLIFTON BEALE
Defendant:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, KATHLEEN SETTIMI, DONNA L. CRUMP, SR. and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
RAINES et al v. AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv66846
Plaintiff:
CHARLES WARREN RAINES, JANEY RAINES, JANEY SUE RAINES and others
Defendant:
AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC., AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION, CERTAINTEED CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
ULFERTS v. FRANKLIN RESOURCES, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv01309
Plaintiff:
DONALD ULFERTS
Defendant:
FRANKLIN RESOURCES, INC., FRANKLIN ADVISORS, INC. and FRANKLIN/TEMPLETON DISTRIBUTORS, INC.
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
MILLER/ULFERTS (Movant Group)
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
ALEXANDER et al v. FRANKLIN RESOURCES, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv00848
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN ALEXANDER
Defendant:
FRANKLIN RESOURCES, INC., FRANKLIN ADVISERS, INC. and FRANKLIN/TEMPLETON DISTRIBUTORS, INC.
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
DONALD ULFERTS
Movant:
MILLER/ULFERTS (Movant Group)
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
TEMPLETON et al v. NATIONAL GYPSUM COMPANY et al
as 2:2007cv62165
Plaintiff:
ALBERT FLEMING TEMPLETON, ALBERT FLEMING TEMPLETON, ALBERT FLEMING TEMPLETON and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL GYPSUM COMPANY, NATIONAL GYPSUM COMPANY, UNITED STATES GYPSUM COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
