Cases 61 - 68 of 68
MILLETTE v. SMITH et al
as 2:2009cv04219
Plaintiff:
MARIAN D. MILLETTE
Defendant:
WILLIAM SMITH, CHRISTINE M. SMITH, JOHN DOES 1 THROUGH 5 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
MCDOUGALD v. SMITH et al
as 3:2009cv04248
Plaintiff:
STEPHANIE MCDOUGALD
Defendant:
M. SMITH, B. PITTMAN and A. ATKINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MALONEY et al v. MICROSOFT CORPORATION
as 3:2009cv02047
Plaintiff:
JAMES R. MALONEY, MARYLEE M. MALONEY and CATHERINE M. SMITH
Defendant:
MICROSOFT CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
FISH et al v. EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY et al
as 3:2009cv00129
Plaintiff:
DAVID C. FISH, RICHARD J. GAUDY, ANGELO M. AGUILERA and others
Defendant:
EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY, KODAK RETIREMENT INCOME PLAN and KODAK RETIREMENT INCOME PLAN COMMITTEE
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
SMITH et al
as 1:2008cv06353
Petitioner:
DAVID J. SMITH and ANITA M. SMITH
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
SMITH v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2008cv01445
Plaintiff:
TRINA M. SMITH
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
SMITH v. NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION
as 2:2007cv06113
Plaintiff:
STAFFORD M. SMITH
Defendant:
NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SMITH v. MERIDA et al
as 1:2007cv00448
Plaintiff:
DARYL M. SMITH
Defendant:
JAMES W. MERIDA, J.B. HUNT TRANSPORTING, INC., JOHN DOES and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
JAMES W. MERIDA and J.B. HUNT TRANSPORTING, INC.
ThirdParty Defendant:
ESTES EXPRESS LINES, Jason Passaro and ESTES EXPRESS LINES, INC.,
Counter Claimant:
ESTES EXPRESS LINES, INC., and Jason Passaro
Counter Defendant:
JAMES W. MERIDA and J.B. HUNT TRANSPORTING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
