Cases 71 - 80 of 121
INNOVELIS, INC. v. AUCH et al
as 2:2015cv02661
Plaintiff:
INNOVELIS, INC.
Defendant:
AUCH, BOOMPOW INTERNATIONAL, CO2CREA and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
CROLL-REYNOLDS COMPANY, INC. v. FLINT HILLS RESOURCES PINE BEND, LLC. et al
as 2:2015cv01719
Plaintiff:
CROLL-REYNOLDS COMPANY, INC.
Defendant:
FLINT HILLS RESOURCES PINE BEND, LLC. and JOHN DOE ENTITIES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CONGOO, LLC. v. HDIMAXMEDIA, INC. et al
as 3:2015cv01423
Plaintiff:
CONGOO, LLC
Defendant:
HDIMAXMEDIA, INC. , RAAJ BRAR, JOHN DOES 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Colahar et al v. Wells Fargo et al
as 1:2014cv01450
Plaintiff:
Jan'e Colahar and Rudolph Colahar
Defendant:
Wells Fargo, Corporation Services Company, Mortgage Lenders Network and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARRIS CAMDEN REALTY, LLC v. ECULLET, INC. et al
as 1:2014cv06053
Plaintiff:
HARRIS CAMDEN REALTY, LLC
Defendant:
ECULLET, INC. , JOHN DOE (1-10) and JOHN DOE ENTITIES (1-10)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC. v. STELLATO et al
as 1:2014cv00300
Plaintiff:
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC.
Defendant:
JOSEPH STELLATO and JOHN DOE ENTITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv07601
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC. V. JOHN KIM, ET AL
as 2:2013cv07644
Plaintiff:
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC.
Defendant:
JOHN KIM and JOHN DOE ENTITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
AKISHEV et al v. KAPUSTIN et al
as 1:2013cv07152
Plaintiff:
ARDAK AKISHEV , ZHANDOS ALIAKPAROV , ALEXEY BATALOV and others
Defendant:
SERGEY KAPUSTIN, IRINA KAPUSTIN, MICHAEL GOLOVERYA and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
JHANG et al v. KIM et al
as 2:2013cv06359
Plaintiff:
MYONG JA JHANG, KATHLEEN BANG WHAN CHANG and DONG IL KIM
Defendant:
PAUL DONG UK KIM, HAEKYONG KIM, KYUNG SOON KIM and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
