Cases 71 - 80 of 1,755
Turner v. Acer Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01185
Plaintiff:
Kevin Turner
Defendant:
Acer Therapeutics, Inc., Stephen J. Aselage, Jason Amello and others
Jones v. Acer Therapeutics Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01186
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jones
Defendant:
Acer Therapeutics, Inc., Stephen J. Aselage, Jason Amello and others
Clark v. Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01180
Plaintiff:
John Clark
Defendant:
Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Jerome Durso, Paolo Fundaro and others
Swaziek v. Hochschild et al
as 1:2023cv01174
Plaintiff:
Stuart Swaziek
Defendant:
Roger C. Hochschild, John T. Greene, R. Mark Graf and others
Nominal Defendant:
Discover Financial Services
Woods et al v. Bain et al
as 1:2023cv01158
Plaintiff:
Lori Woods and Makar Stozhyk
Defendant:
Adam Bain, Cipora Herman, Jonathan Jaffe and others
Nominal Defendant:
Opendoor Technologies, Inc.
McDaniels v. NextGen Healthcare, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01149
Plaintiff:
John McDaniels
Defendant:
NextGen Healthcare, Inc., Jeffrey H. Margolis, Craig A. Barbarosh and others
Marti et al v. Mahadevia et al
as 1:2023cv01133
Plaintiff:
Guillermo Marti and Felicia Marti JT Ten
Defendant:
Ankit Mahadevia, Satyavrat Shukla, Milind Deshpande and others
Nominal Defendant:
Spero Therapeutics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Smith v. Avid Technology, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01137
Plaintiff:
Nathan Smith
Defendant:
Avid Technology, Inc., John P. Wallace, Christian A. Asmar and others
Jones v. Avid Technology, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01139
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jones
Defendant:
Avid Technology, Inc., John P. Wallace, Christian A. Asmar and others
Reed v. Office of U.S. Trustee et al
as 1:2023cv01117
Petitioner:
James Reed
Respondent:
Office of U.S. Trustee, Woodbridge Mortgage Investment Fund 1 LLC, Silverleaf Funding LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
