Cases filed in Pennsylvania
CENTIMARK CORPORATION v. ALBERTSON'S LLC
as 2:2022cv01250
Plaintiff: CENTIMARK CORPORATION
Defendant: ALBERTON'S LLC and ALBERTSONS LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA v. CVS RX SERVICES, INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv04701
Plaintiff: CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Defendant: CVS RX SERVICES, INC., CVS PHARMACY, INC., PENNSYLVANIA CVS PHARMACY L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DEAN et al v. ALBERTSONS, LLC et al
as 2:2016cv01206
Plaintiff: ARIF DEAN and JOSEPHINE DEAN
Defendant: ALBERTSONS, LLC, SUPERVALU, INC. and ACME MARKETS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HAMILTON v. ACME MARKET et al
as 2:2015cv04786
Plaintiff: DOROTHY HAMILTON
Defendant: ACME MARKET, ALBERTSON'S, LLC, ACME MARKETS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
THE KROGER CO. et al v. UNITED EGG PRODUCERS, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv06705
Plaintiff: THE KROGER CO. , SAFEWAY INC. , WALGREEN CO. and others
Defendant: UNITED EGG PRODUCERS, INC., UNITED EGG ASSOCIATION, UNITED STATES EGG MARKETERS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
ALBERTSON'S LLC et al v. CADBURY SCHWEPPES PLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv02132
Plaintiff: Albertson's llc, The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc. and Heb grocery company, lp
Defendant: Cadbury Schweppes PLC, Cadbury adams usa llc, Cadbury Adams Canada, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
ALBERTSON'S LLC et al v. CADBURY SCHWEPPES PLC et al
as 2:2009cv04380
Plaintiff: ALBERTSON'S LLC, THE GREAT ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA COMPANY, INC. and HEB GROCERY COMPANY, LP
Defendant: CADBURY SCHWEPPES PLC, CADBURY ADAMS USA LLC, CADBURY ADAMS CANADA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?