Cases 1 - 5 of 5
In re: Asbestos Products Liabi
as 13-4116
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CATHY ANN BAXLEY, individually and as personal representative of the Estate of Jimmie Williams
Defendant - Appellee:
ADVANCE AUTO PARTS INC, Corporate Successor to Western Auto Parts Inc, A Delaware Corporation, ALCO PRODUCTS INC, a New York Corporation, ALLIS CHALMERS CORP, a Delaware Corporation and others
In re: Asbestos Products Liabi
as 13-4116
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CATHY ANN BAXLEY, individually and as personal representative of the Estate of Jimmie Williams
Defendant:
FORD MOTOR CO, A Delaware Corporation, BORGWARNER CORP, FKA BorgWarner Morse TEC, by its Successor Interest to, a Delaware Corporation, RPM INTERNATIONAL INC, an Ohio Corporation and others
Defendant / Appellee:
GEORGIA PACIFIC LLC, a Delaware Corporation and HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC, A Delaware Corporation, AKA Allied Signal
In re: Asbestos Products Liabi
as 13-4115
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CATHY ANN BAXLEY, individually and as personal representative of the Estate of Jimmie Williams
Defendant:
FORD MOTOR CO, A Delaware Corporation, BORGWARNER CORP, FKA BorgWarner Morse TEC, by its Successor Interest to, a Delaware Corporation, RPM INTERNATIONAL INC, an Ohio Corporation and others
Defendant / Appellee:
GEORGIA PACIFIC LLC, a Delaware Corporation
In re: Asbestos Products Liabi
as 13-4115
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CATHY ANN BAXLEY, individually and as personal representative of the Estate of Jimmie Williams
Defendant - Appellee:
ADVANCE AUTO PARTS INC, Corporate Successor to Western Auto Parts Inc, A Delaware Corporation, ALCO PRODUCTS INC, a New York Corporation, ALLIS CHALMERS CORP, a Delaware Corporation and others
BAXLEY v. ADVANCE AUTO PARTS INC et al
as 2:2011cv63922
Plaintiff:
CATHY ANN BAXLEY
Defendant:
ADVANCE AUTO PARTS INC , ALCO PRODUCTS INC, ALLEN-BRADLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
