Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Emrit v. Combs et al
as 1:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Sean Combs, Bad Boy Entertainment and Atlantic Records
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Estyle Corp, LLC v. Marit, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv01393
Defendant:
Marit, LLC, Ecoco, Inc., Talyoni LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Estyle Corp, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Adams et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00847
Plaintiff:
Christina Adams, Peter Eldridge, Jonathan Fessenden and others
Defendant:
Michael Brewer and Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Aboites et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00829
Plaintiff:
Cherilyn Aboites, Lois Allen, Carol Alsay and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Abernathy et al. v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00805
Plaintiff:
Quint Abernathy, Deletha Adams, Brooke Anderson and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Akers et al. v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00760
Plaintiff:
Delbert Akers, Mark Alcorn, Lori Alexander and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Hooli v. Mitcham et al
as 1:2021cv00702
Defendant:
Todd Combs and Larry Mitcham
Plaintiff:
Basavaraj Hooli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Binns Blount v. Sprint Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv01661
Defendant:
Stephen R. Kappes, Masayoshi Son, Gordon M. Bethune and others
Plaintiff:
Bernadette E. Binns Blount
Muehlgay v. Sprint Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv01622
Defendant:
Masayoshi Son, Julius Genachowski, Stephen Kappes and others
Plaintiff:
Howard Muehlgay
Klein v. Sprint Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv01551
Defendant:
Masayoshi Son, Patrick Doyle, Julius Genachowski and others
Plaintiff:
Pamela Klein
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
