Cases 1 - 9 of 9
LINK et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 2:2023cv02635
Plaintiff:
John Link, Jr., KEITH ACTON, DENNIS AHRENS and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, AGC CHEMICALS AMERICAS INC, AMEREX CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
CROCHET v. BAYER CORPORATION et al
as 3:2017cv02064
Defendant:
BAYER CORPORATION, BAYER HEALTHCARE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., BAYER PHARMA AG and others
Plaintiff:
GEORGE CROCHET
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CROCHET et al v. A.C. & S., INC. et al
as 2:2011cv60186
Plaintiff:
MILTON LEE CROCHET and GEORGIA H. CROCHET
Defendant:
A.C. & S., INC., A.P. GREEN REFRACTORIES, CO. , ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CROCHET v. A.R. WILFLEY & SONS et al
as 2:2009cv78227
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE CROCHET and LAWRENCE CROCHET
Defendant:
A.R. WILFLEY & SONS, ACF VALVES, ACF INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Crochet v. Oyster et al
as 1:2009cv00177
Plaintiff:
Troy D Crochet
Defendant:
Michael Oyster, Billy V Ray, Raymond J Smith and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Troy D Crochet v. C&B Cotton Holdings, Inc. Et Al
as 1:2009cv00176
Defendant:
Cotton Telecom, Inc. and C&B Cotton Holdings, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Troy D Crochet
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00149
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008mc00214
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
CROCHET v. E.D. BULLARD et al
as 2:2008cv61245
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR JOSEPH CROCHET, ARTHUR JOSEPH CROCHET, ARTHUR JOSEPH CROCHET and others
Defendant:
E.D. BULLARD, ATLAS TURNER, INC., ATLAS TURNER, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
