Cases 1 - 10 of 81
WISNIEWSKI v. MARKET STREET CVS, INC. ET AL
as 2:2024cv01235
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA CVS PHARMACY, L.L.C., MARKET STREET CVS, INC., CVS PHARMACY and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINE WISNIEWSKI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
JONES et al v. CVS HEALTH CORPORATION et al
as 2:2024cv01703
Defendant:
CVS HEALTH CORPORATION, CVS CAREMARK CORPORATION, SILVERSCRIPT INSURANCE COMPANY, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DENISE ELAYNE JONES and MARILYN A. MANZI
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
SHMARUK v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 2:2023cv22609
Plaintiff:
BORIS SHMARUK
Defendant:
UNITED HEALTHCARE SERIVES, INC., LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, UNITED HEALTHCARE and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS CORPORATION et al v. SMITH, et al
as 2:2019cv08761
Plaintiff:
ROCHE DIABETES CARE, INC. and ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS CORPORATION
Cross Defendant:
MERCATO MANAGEMENT, LLC, MERCATO PARTNERS AI II, L.P., KESMAN HUGHES & COMPANY, LLC and others
Defendant:
SAHILY PAOLINE, MERCATO PARTNERS GROWTH II, L.P., MERCATO PARTNERS INGRAM CO-INVEST, LLC and others
Cross Claimant:
JEFFREY C. SMITH
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
ZIONS BANCORPORATION, N.A.
Special Master:
THE HONORABLE DENNIS M. CAVANAUGH
Interested Party:
Bradley W. Howard and Jeffrey S. Baird
3Rd Party Defendant:
EXPRESS SCRIPTS HOLDING COMPANY D/B/A EXPRESS SCRIPTS, CVS CAREMARK, XYZ Corporation Pharmacy Benefit Managers 1-99 and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
LIFESCAN, INC. et al v. SMITH et al
as 2:2017cv05552
Cross Defendant:
SAHILY PAOLINE, STEVEN L. HADLOCK, MERCATO PARTNERS AI II, L.P. and others
Cross Claimant:
JEFFREY C. SMITH
Plaintiff:
LIFESCAN, INC.
Interested Party:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON HEALTHCARE SYSTEMS, INC., Bradley W. Howard and Jeffrey S. Baird
Defendant:
GEOFFREY S. SWINDLE, MERCATO MANAGEMENT, LLC, ADAM KOOPERSMITH and others
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
ZB, N.A.
Special Master:
THE HONORABLE DENNIS M. CAVANAUGH
3Rd Party Defendant:
XYZ Corporation Pharmacy Benefit Manger 1-99, PRIME THERAPEUTICS LLC, XYZ Corporation Distributors 1-99 and others
Petitioner:
KPMG LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
LOCAL NO. 1 HEALTH FUND v. PLAN OF BENEFITS FOR THE LOCAL NO. 1 HEALTH FUND et al
as 2:2023cv21160
Plaintiff:
LOCAL NO. 1 HEALTH FUND
Defendant:
PLAN OF BENEFITS FOR THE LOCAL NO. 1 HEALTH FUND, ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, NOVO NORDISK INC. and others
In Re:
INSULIN PRICING LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
PROFESSIONAL DRUG COMPANY, INC. v. WYETH, INC.
as 3:2011cv05479
Defendant:
WYETH LLC, WYETH, INC., WYETH PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and others
Not Yet Classified:
HEB GROCERY COMPANY LP, RITE AID CORPORATION, PAINTERS DISTRICT COUNCIL NO. 30 HEALTH & WELFARE FUND and others
Not Classified By Court:
FAITH HOCHBERG
In Re:
EFFEXOR XR ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Special Master:
JONATHAN J. LERNER
Interested Party:
IBEW -- NECA Local 505 Health & Welfare Plan, MC -- UA Local 119 Health & Welfare Plan, CADILA HEALTHCARE LIMITED and others
Plaintiff:
Individual Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs and PROFESSIONAL DRUG COMPANY, INC.
Petitioner:
TIMMY P. THIEN
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
GONZALEZ v. HETERO DRUGS LTD. et al
as 1:2022cv06321
Plaintiff:
PEDRO GONZALEZ
Defendant:
HETERO DRUGS LTD., HETERO LABS LTD., JOHN DOE and others
In Re:
VALSARTAN LOSARTAN AND IRBESARTAN PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DOE v. CVS HEALTH CORPORATION et al
as 2:2022cv02049
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE
Defendant:
CVS HEALTH CORPORATION, CVS PHARMACY, INC., CVS CAREMARK SPECIALTY PHARMACY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
English et al v. CVS Caremark
as 3:2022cv00656
Plaintiff:
Patricia English and Richard English
Defendant:
CVS Caremark
Not Classified By Court:
Mediator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
