Cases 1 - 10 of 14,622
MUELLER v. DURABLA MANUFACTURING COMPANY et al
as 2:2012cv07138
Plaintiff:
CLEMENTE MUELLER, P.A.
Defendant:
DURABLA MANUFACTURING COMPANY, DURABLA CANADA LTD ASBESTOS TRUST, AIG and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012mc00144
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
ETHERDIGE v. 3M et al
as 2:2011cv67791
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY H. ETHERDIGE
Defendant:
3M , ANCHOR DARLING VALVE COMPANY, A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES v. 3M et al
as 2:2011cv67785
Plaintiff:
VENISE FAYE JONES
Defendant:
3M , ANCHOR DARLING VALVE COMPANY, A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ALLEN v. 3M et al
as 2:2011cv67786
Plaintiff:
JOE L. ALLEN
Defendant:
3M , ANCHOR DARLING VALVE COMPANY, A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BLACKWELL v. 3M et al
as 2:2011cv67789
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM M. BLACKWELL
Defendant:
3M , ANCHOR DARLING VALVE COMPANY, A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES v. 3M et al
as 2:2011cv67788
Plaintiff:
KENNETH R. JONES
Defendant:
3M , ANCHOR DARLING VALVE COMPANY, A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McDANIEL v. 3M et al
as 2:2011cv67787
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM McDANIEL
Defendant:
3M , ANCHOR DARLING VALVE COMPANY, A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARBIN v. 3M et al
as 2:2011cv67790
Plaintiff:
HUGH RAY HARBIN
Defendant:
3M , ANCHOR DARLING VALVE COMPANY, A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LEGG v. ARMSTRONG INTERNATIONAL INC. et al
as 2:2011cv67222
Plaintiff:
GREGORY A. LEGG
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG INTERNATIONAL INC. , A W CHESTERTON COMPANY , CBS CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
