Cases 1 - 10 of 629
MULAWKA v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2011cv01651
Plaintiff:
MARZENA MULAWKA
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, MERCER COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BRIDGER v. BORG-WARNER et al
as 2:2010cv79293
Plaintiff:
LINDA P. BRIDGER
Defendant:
BORG-WARNER , CHRYSLER CORPORATION , EATON CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BRODERICK et al v. ARMCO, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv62985
Plaintiff:
ENID BRODERICK, ARLETTE GILBERT, STEVEN BRODERICK and others
Defendant:
ARMCO, INC., ARMCO, INC., ABEX CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
MORRIS v. ABNEY MILLS et al
as 2:2008cv86174
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM MORRIS
Defendant:
ABNEY MILLS, A.W. CHESTERTON, ADVANCE AUTO PARTS STORE and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
ROLLO v. ABNEY MILLS et al
as 2:2008cv86182
Plaintiff:
EDNA ROLLO
Defendant:
ABNEY MILLS, A.W. CHESTERTON, ADVANCE AUTO PARTS STORE and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
WILLIAMS v. ABNEY MILLS et al
as 2:2008cv86193
Plaintiff:
CARL WILLIAMS
Defendant:
ABNEY MILLS, A.W. CHESTERTON, ADVANCE AUTO PARTS STORE and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
TERRELL v. ABNEY MILLS et al
as 2:2008cv86186
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. TERRELL
Defendant:
ABNEY MILLS, A.W. CHESTERTON, ADVANCE AUTO PARTS STORE and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
JOHNSON v. ABNEY MILLS et al
as 2:2008cv86160
Plaintiff:
LINDA JOHNSON
Defendant:
ABNEY MILLS, A.W. CHESTERTON, ADVANCE AUTO PARTS STORE and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
TAYLOR v. ABNEY MILLS et al
as 2:2008cv86185
Plaintiff:
WILLIE TAYLOR
Defendant:
ABNEY MILLS, A.W. CHESTERTON, ADVANCE AUTO PARTS STORE and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
MCMILLAN v. ABNEY MILLS et al
as 2:2008cv86169
Plaintiff:
MILLER MCMILLAN
Defendant:
ABNEY MILLS, A.W. CHESTERTON, ADVANCE AUTO PARTS STORE and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
