Cases 1 - 8 of 8
MOORE v. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2022cv03500
Cross Claimant:
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
GUY EDWARD MOORE
Defendant:
FEDEX CORPORATION and JEAN-PAUL BENNETT
Cross Defendant:
ABC COMPANIES 1-10 and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
MOORE v. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION et al
as 1:2022cv03500
Defendant:
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION, FedEx Corporation, JEAN-PAUL BENNETT and others
Plaintiff:
GUY EDWARD MOORE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
SHERWOOD, ET AL. v. 3M, ET AL.
as 2:2008cv75573
Plaintiff:
GUY EDWARD SHERWOOD
Defendant:
3M, A-BEX CORPORATION, A.K. STEEL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
DYCUS v. ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2008cv65631
Plaintiff:
GUY EDWARDS DYCUS and GUY EDWARDS DYCUS
Defendant:
ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
IVEY et al v. AQUA-CHEM, INC et al
as 2:2007cv64668
Plaintiff:
GUY EDWARD IVEY and SARAH ELAINE IVEY
Defendant:
AQUA-CHEM, INC, BORG WARNER MORSE TEC INC., CERTAINTEED CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
JOHNSON v. OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv62976
Plaintiff:
GUY EDWARD JOHNSON, JR.
Defendant:
OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC., OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC., OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
SPARROW et al v. NATIONAL GYPSUM COMPANY et al
as 2:2007cv61846
Plaintiff:
GUY EDWARD SPARROW, JOAN KAY SPARROW, JOAN KAY SPARROW and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL GYPSUM COMPANY, NATIONAL GYPSUM COMPANY, NATIONAL GYPSUM COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
MCCULLOUGH et al v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERG et al
as 2:2007cv61329
Plaintiff:
GUY EDWARD MCCULLOUGH and CYBIL T MCCULLOUGH
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERG, CELOTEX CORPORATION, NATIONAL GYPSUM COMP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
