Cases 1 - 10 of 93
Murphy v. State of Delaware Family Court et al
as 1:2024cv00717
Plaintiff:
Kevin Donnell Murphy
Defendant:
State of Delaware Family Court, Andreza Peticacis, Michelle Hoffman and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Brown v. Sanchez et al
as 1:2024cv00672
Plaintiff:
Demetrius John Brown
Defendant:
Glorimar Sanchez, Julie Patterson, Darwin Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Adrienne Arrington et al v. H.I.G. Capital Management LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00550
Plaintiff:
Adrienne Arrington, Alecia Guarneros, Alexa Sanchez and others
Defendant:
H.I.G. Capital Management LLC, John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relatio
Wright v. Harpoon Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00194
Plaintiff:
Matthew Wright
Defendant:
Harpoon Therapeutics, Inc., Joseph S. Bailes, Mark Chin and others
Wilhelm v. Mirati Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01298
Plaintiff:
Robert Wilhelm
Defendant:
Mirati Therapeutics, Inc., Faheem Hasnain, Charles Baum and others
Wheeler v. Mirati Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01297
Plaintiff:
Jacob Wheeler
Defendant:
Mirati Therapeutics, Inc., Faheem Hasnain, Charles Baum and others
Floyd v. NextGen Healthcare, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01150
Plaintiff:
Michael Floyd
Defendant:
NextGen Healthcare, Inc., Jeffrey H. Margolis, Craig A. Barbarosh and others
McDaniels v. NextGen Healthcare, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01149
Plaintiff:
John McDaniels
Defendant:
NextGen Healthcare, Inc., Jeffrey H. Margolis, Craig A. Barbarosh and others
Moore v. Amedisys, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00902
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Moore
Defendant:
Amedisys, Inc., Richard Ashworth, Paul Kusserow and others
Kent v. Oak Street Health, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00371
Plaintiff:
Michael Kent
Defendant:
Oak Street Health, Inc., Mike Pykosz, Geoffrey Price and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
