Cases 1 - 10 of 26
TFORCE FREIGHT, INC. v. NEVES et al
as 2:2023cv01960
Plaintiff:
TFORCE FREIGHT, INC.
Defendant:
MARCELO NEVES and WORLD CRYSTAL BUSINESS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
NORTH AMERICAN COMPANY FOR LIFE AND HEALTH INSURANCE v. NEVES
as 2:2023cv01380
Plaintiff:
NORTH AMERICAN COMPANY FOR LIFE AND HEALTH INSURANCE
Defendant:
CRISTINA NEVES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
CORBETT v. SCOTT et al
as 2:2023cv01359
Plaintiff:
TERRENCE CORBETT
Defendant:
B. SCOTT and NEVES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NEVES v. MERCK & CO, INC. et al
as 3:2022cv05062
Plaintiff:
ISABELLA NEVES
Defendant:
MERCK & CO, INC. and MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
ABABOO LLC v. HFN SERVICES CORP. et al
as 2:2022cv03240
Plaintiff:
ABABOO LLC
Defendant:
HFN SERVICES CORP. and HELTON NEVES
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Waters v. Behring et al
as 1:2020cv00346
Defendant:
Marcel Hermann Telles, John C. Pope, David H. Knopf and others
Nominal Defendant:
The Kraft Heinz Company
Plaintiff:
Dale Waters
HORVATH v. NEVES et al
as 3:2017cv04167
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN HORVATH
Defendant:
ANGEL S. NEVES , APPROVED STORAGE AND WASTE HAULING and JOHN DOES #1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv03445
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
NEVE v. JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS INC. et al
as 3:2017cv03021
Plaintiff:
MARTHASUE NEVE
Defendant:
JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS INC., JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT LLC, JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv03275
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
