Cases 1 - 10 of 6,845
In re: Rodrick Brayboy
as 24-1924
Petitioner:
In re: RODRICK BRAYBOY
Respondent:
MAHANOY SCI, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF JOSHUA D. SHAPIRO, DISTRICT ATTORNEY DELAWARE COUNTY and others
In re: Michael Reynolds
as 24-1933
Petitioner:
In re: MICHAEL CURTIS REYNOLDS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Wawa, Inc. Data Security LitigationIn re: Wawa, Inc. Data Security Litigation
as 24-1874
Not Yet Classified:
In re: WAWA INC DATA SECURITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
THEODORE H. FRANK, SHAWN MCGLADE, KAREN MCGLADE, ON BEHALF OF THEMSELVES AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED and others
Defendant:
WAWA INC and WILD GOOSE HOLDING CO
David TurnerIn re: David Turner
as 24-1848
Petitioner:
In re: DAVID TURNER
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
Alex LovejoyIn re: Alex Lovejoy
as 24-1869
Petitioner:
In re: ALEX LOVEJOY
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY DAUPHIN COUNTY
John BuckshawIn re: John Buckshaw
as 24-1855
Petitioner:
In re: JOHN J. BUCKSHAW
Respondent:
JOHN ROSENBURGER and ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY
Arthur ArmstrongIn re: Arthur Armstrong
as 24-8015
Petitioner:
In re: ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA
Jamiel Lawrence WilliamsIn re: Jamiel Lawrence Williams
as 24-1843
Petitioner:
In re: JAMIEL L. WILLIAMS
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
Kevino GrahamIn re: Kevino Graham
as 24-1756
Petitioner:
In re: KEVINO GRAHAM
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and CYNTHIA M. RUFE
IN RE EX PARTE APPLICATION OF NORDEX ENERGY SE & CO. KG FOR AN ORDER PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1782 TO CONDUCT DISCOVERY FOR USE IN FOREIGN PROCEEDINGS.
as 2:2024mc00018
Plaintiff:
IN RE EX PARTE APPLICATION OF NORDEX ENERGY SE & CO. KG FOR AN ORDER PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1782 TO CONDUCT DISCOVERY FOR USE IN FOREIGN PROCEEDINGS
Petitioner:
NORDEX ENERGY SE & CO. KG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
