Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Commissioners of Public Works of the City of Charleston et al v. USALCO, LLC et al
as 3:2019cv12197
Plaintiff:
Commission of Public Works of the City of Greenville SC, Commissioners of Public Works of the City of Charleston, City of Winston-Salem and others
Defendant:
Delta Chemical Corporation, USALCO LLC, John Doe Nos. 1 - 50 and others
In Re:
LIQUID ALUMINUM SULFATE ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Commissioners of Public Works of the City of Charleston et al v. USALCO, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv12197
Plaintiff:
Commission of Public Works of the City of Greenville SC, Commissioners of Public Works of the City of Charleston, City of Winston-Salem and others
Defendant:
Delta Chemical Corporation, USALCO LLC, John Doe Nos. 1 - 50 and others
In Re:
LIQUID ALUMINUM SULFATE ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Commission of Public Works of the City of Greenville SC v. General Chemical Corporation et al
as 2:2018cv11027
Defendant:
CHEMTRADE CHEMICALS CORPORATION, BRENNTAG MID-SOUTH, INC., GENERAL CHEMICAL CORPORATION and others
In Re:
LIQUID ALUMINUM SULFATE ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
Commission of Public Works of the City of Greenville SC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
BROWN v. CITY OF GREENVILLE et al
as 3:2017cv01448
Plaintiff:
STACY D BROWN
Defendant:
CITY OF GREENVILLE, DOUGLAS RAY CREDLE, HAMMOCKS HATTERAS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
LIQUID ALUMINUM SULFATE ANTITRUST LITIGATION
as 2:2016md02687
Plaintiff:
Rivanna Water & Sewer Authority, CITY OF FERGUS FALLS, MINNESOTA, INTERSTATE CHEMICAL CO., INC. and others
Defendant:
VINCENT J. OPALEWSKI, SOUTHERN IONICS, INC., C&S CHEMICALS (OF GEORGIA) INC. and others
Intervenor:
US Department of Justice and Lawrence McShane
Special Master:
DENNIS M. CAVANAUGH and JUDGE FAITH S. HOCHBERG
In Re:
LIQUID ALUMINUM SULFATE ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
