Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 62
Carmela Susino on her own behalf and on behalf of the Estate of Decedent, Luciano Susino and his beneficiaries v. 3M Company
as 3:2021cv00038
Plaintiff: Carmela Susino on her own behalf and on behalf of the Estate of Decedent, Luciano Susino and his beneficiaries
Defendant: 3M Company, VIACOMCBS Inc. (f/k/a CBS Corporation, f/k/a VIACOM, Inc. successor-by-merger with CBS Corporation f/k/a Westinghouse Electric Corporation), a Delaware Corporation with its principal place of business, Hess Oil Virgin Island Corp., a U.S. Virgin Islands Corporation with is principal place of business in New York and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
In Re: Asbestos Products Liab, et al
as 14-4155
Plaintiff - Appellant: WILLIAM E. CARPER
Defendant - Appellee: GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, CBS CORP, f/k/a VIACOM, INC. SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO CBS CORPORATION f/k/a WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION, VIACOM and others
Asbestos Products Liability, et al, et al
as 12-2538
Plaintiff - Appellant: GAIL REAM, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Heirs and Estate of Raymond Rice, deceased, Neal Rice and Jill Schnepf, NEAL RICE and JILL SCHNEPF
Defendant - Appellee: THOMAS DEE ENG CO, COOPER US, INC, f/k/a Cooper Industries, LLC (as successor-in-interest to White Superior Division f/k/a Superior Gas Engine Company), ROCKWELL AUTOMATION INC, (sued individually and as successor-by-merger to Allen-Bradley Company, LLC and as successor-in-interest to Rostone Corporation) and others
SEDBERRY v. AQUA-CHEM, INC. DOING BUSINESS AS CLEAVER-BROOKS DIVISION et al
as 2:2010cv60091
Plaintiff: BETTY DUNN SEDBERRY
Defendant: AQUA-CHEM, INC. DOING BUSINESS AS CLEAVER-BROOKS DIVISION, BORG WARNER CORPORATION, CERTAINTEED CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
CURRIE v. CURRIE et al
as 2:2009cv91867
Defendant: ERNEST WADE CURRIE, A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, CERTAINTEED CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff: SANDRA M. CURRIE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type: Torts - Injury None
BOWMAN et al v. A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY et al
as 2:2009cv91866
Plaintiff: RONALD CLARK BOWMAN and CYNTHIA BOWMAN
Defendant: A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, CERTAINTEED CORPORATION, CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC., A DIVISION OF AQUA-CHEM, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type: Torts - Injury None
OTTINGER et al v. A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY et al
as 2:2009cv91868
Plaintiff: NATHAN LEE OTTINGER and JUDY L. OTTINGER
Defendant: A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, CERTAINTEED CORPORATION, CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC., A DIVISION OF AQUA-CHEM, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type: Torts - Injury None
SMATHERS v. A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY
as 2:2009cv91865
Plaintiff: LAURA O. SMATHERS
Defendant: A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, BORG-WARNER MORSE TEC, INC., CERTAINTEED CORPORATION and others
Cross Defendant: UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION, RAPID AMERICAN CORPORATION (successor by merger to Glen Alden Corporation, Briggs Manufacuturing Company, Philip Carey Corporation and Philip Carey Manufacturing Company) doing business as Cleaver-Bro, VIACOM, INC. (successor by merger to CBS Corporation f/k/a/Westinghouse Electric Corporation) and others
Cross Claimant: A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type: Torts - Injury None
SIMMONS et al v. A. W. CHESTERTON COMPANY et al
as 2:2009cv90823
Plaintiff: MARGARET HARKEY SIMMONS and JACKSON E. SIMMONS, SR.
Defendant: A. W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, BORG-WARNER MORSE TEC, INC., CERTAINTEED CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type: Torts - Injury None
WHITE et al v. ALFA LAVAL, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv90825
Plaintiff: ALAN ROY WHITE and SUSAN M. WHITE
Defendant: ALFA LAVAL, INC., AURORA PUMP, A. W. CHESTERTON COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?