Cases 1 - 7 of 7
US v. Wallace Dixon Cox
as 17-2195
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Beneficiary and UNITED STATES ATTORNEY JOHN STUART BRUCE, Substitute Trustee
Defendant - Appellant:
WALLACE DIXON COX and LISA COX
US v. Harry Montgomery
as 17-2075
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, acting through the Rural Housing Service or successor agency and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Defendant - Appellant:
HARRY MONTGOMERY
Defendant:
GERMANIQUE CHATMAN, a/k/a Germanique R. Chatman
Bank of America, N.A. v. Elois Baxter
as 17-2028
Plaintiff - Appellee:
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
Defendant - Appellant:
ELOIS C. BAXTER
Defendant:
THE SUMMIT COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, INC. and THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, acting by and through its agency, The Secretary of Housing and Urban Development
Thomas Beaumont, III v. South State Bank
as 16-1071
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS WILSON BEAUMONT, III, House of Beaumont, Beneficiary, Pre-1861 private American Citizen of the United States of America, the de jure Republic
Defendant - Appellee:
SOUTH STATE BANK and UNKNOWN TRUSTEES 1-10
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Eddie Hunt
as 13-2450
Plaintiff - Appellee:
WELLS FARGO BANK WEST N.A., f/k/a First Union National Bank, Successor to Wachovia Bank N A and WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., f/k/a First Union National Bank, Successor to Wachovia Bank, N.A.
Defendant - Appellant:
EDDIE D. HUNT and TERESA HUNT, a/k/a Teresa T. Hunt
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, acting by and through its agency Internal Revenue Service and MCM ASSOCIATES, INC., d/b/a ServPro of Southeast Greenville
Aida Ziadeh v. US
as 08-1154
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AIDA L. ZIADEH
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC v. US
as 07-2174
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BAYVIEW LOAN SERVICING, LLC, A Delaware Corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
