Cases 81 - 90 of 96
Eddie Cheris v. Washington Metropolitan Area T
as 09-1586
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDDIE CHERIS
Defendant - Appellee:
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
Michael Nielsen v. Curtis Smith
as 09-1567
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL K. NIELSEN
Defendant - Appellee:
CURTIS R. SMITH, CRANDALL CORPORATION, JAN W. ANDERSON and others
Todd Jack v. Bill McCollum
as 09-1271
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TODD M. JACK
Defendant - Appellee:
BILL MCCOLLUM, Attorney General for State of Florida
Charles Pompei, Jr. v. Progressive Insurance Company
as 08-2386
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES POMPEI, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE COMPANY
Charles Pompei, Jr. v. Progressive Insurance Company
as 08-2359
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CHARLES POMPEI, JR.
Defendant - Appellant:
PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE COMPANY
L. Cary v. US
as 08-2192
Plaintiff - Appellant:
L. ANN CARY
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
George Doughty, Jr. v. Barbara Lorenzo
as 08-2139
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEORGE WASHINGTON DOUGHTY, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
BARBARA ANN LORENZO and SOUTHERN GENERAL INSURANCE CO.
Marcus Hesse v. Long & Foster Real Estate, Inc
as 08-1663
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARCUS HESSE, Guardian Ad Litem of Josef Hesse
Plaintiff:
HORST SCHWINN, Guardian Ad Litem of Doerte Hesse
Defendant - Appellee:
LONG & FOSTER REAL ESTATE, INCORPORATED
Defendant - None:
CHARLES STEPHEN EBBETS
Horst Schwinn v. Long and Foster
as 08-1608
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HORST SCHWINN, Guardian Ad Litem of Doerte Hesse
Plaintiff:
MARCUS HESSE, Guardian Ad Litem of Josef Hesse
Defendant - Appellee:
LONG & FOSTER REAL ESTATE, INCORPORATED
Defendant - None:
CHARLES STEPHEN EBBETS
Michael Janoska v. D.C. Development, LLC
as 08-1393
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL JANOSKA and HOLLY JANOSKA
Defendant - Appellee:
D.C. DEVELOPMENT, LLC, DEEP CREEK MARINA, LLC and ADRIAN SPIKER, II
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
