Other Fraud Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jerome Brown, Sr. v. Ivan Davis
as 22-1880
Plaintiff / Appellant: JEROME JULIUS BROWN, SR.
Defendant / Appellee: IVAN D. DAVIS, Magistrate Judge, RICHARD D. FAIRBANK, President CEO Headquarters and DEENA L. REYNOLDS, In-House Landlord Tenant Counsel
Jeffrey Allen v. John Dailey We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-1971
Plaintiff - Appellant: JEFFREY ALLEN
Defendant - Appellee: JOHN DAILEY, DAN BERRY, CEO Duke University Federal Credit Union and ALEX HOLMES, Money Gram CEO
Defendant: CHIEF CERELYN DAVIS, Durham Police Department
Harold Felder v. Buonassissi, Henning & Lash, P
as 14-1649
Plaintiff - Appellant: HAROLD E. FELDER and CHERRY A. FELDER
Defendant - Appellee: BUONASSISSI, HENNING & LASH, P.C., JOSEPH VINCENT BUONASSISSI, II, RICHARD ELLIOTT HENNING, JR., d/b/a Richard Elliott Henning, Jr., Trustee, Attorney and others
Pepi Schafler v. HSBC Bank USA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-1509
Plaintiff - Appellant: PEPI SCHAFLER
Defendant - Appellee: HSBC BANK USA, Martin J. Glynn, CEO
Defendant: JAMES H. FRENCH, French & Lyon, PHILLIPS LYTLE, SCOTT D. MILLER and others
Garnishee - Appellee: BANK OF AMERICA, NA
James Copley v. Richard Fairbank We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-1649
Plaintiff - Appellant: JAMES E. COPLEY
Defendant - Appellee: RICHARD FAIRBANKS, CEO, CAPITAL ONE AUTO FINANCE, INC. and CAPITAL ONE
Pepi Schafler v. HSBC Bank USA
as 10-1826
Plaintiff - Appellant: PEPI SCHAFLER
Defendant - Appellee: HSBC BANK USA, Martin J. Glynn, CEO, SCOTT D. MILLER, PHILLIPS LYTLE and others
Pepi Schafler v. HSBC Bank USA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-2298
Plaintiff - Appellant: PEPI SCHAFLER
Defendant - Appellee: HSBC BANK USA, Martin J. Glynn, CEO, SCOTT D. MILLER, PHILLIPS LYTLE and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?