Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Glendora Manago v. Cane Bay Partners VI, LLLP
as 22-2044
Plaintiff / Appellant: GLENDORA MANAGO, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, KAREN PETERSON, SHARON DAVIS and others
Defendant / Appellee: CANE BAY PARTNERS VI, LLLP, DAVID JOHNSON, KIRK CHEWNING and others
Chris W. Taylor v. Lee W. Bettis, Jr. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-2239
Party Below - Appellant: CHRISTOPHER WYATT LIVINGSTON
Plaintiff - Appellant: CHRIS W. TAYLOR, for himself and all others similarly situated, WILLIAM G. HARRISON, SR., CATHY HORTON HUNT and others
Plaintiff: LINDA SHERYL LUCAS
Defendant - Appellee: LEE W. BETTIS, PAT LEIGH PITTMAN, JOANNE K. PARTIN and others
Defendant: CCDN, LLC., a Nevada limited liability company and 18 U.S.C. 1961(4) association-in-fact, LEGAL DEBT CURE, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company and 18 U.S.C. 1961(4) association-in-fact, R.K. LOCK & ASSOCIATES, d/b/a CCDN, LLC., or The Credit Collections Defense Network, an Illinois sole proprietorship and 18 U.S.C. 1961(4) association-in-fact and others
William Coonts v. Randolph County Commission We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-1537
Plaintiff - Appellant: WILLIAM WAYNE COONTS
Defendant - Appellee: RANDOLPH COUNTY COMMISSION, RANDLOPH COUNTY PROSECUTORS' OFFICE, PHILLIP ISNER and others
Defendant: RANDOLPH COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE and DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN RESOURCES
Brett Kimberlin v. Hunton & William We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-1500
Plaintiff - Appellant: BRETT C. KIMBERLIN
Defendant - Appellee: HUNTON & WILLIAMS, LLP, UNITED STATES CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES and others
John M. Dickson, Jr. v. FBI We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-2168
Plaintiff - Appellant: JOHN M. DICKSON, JR.
Defendant - Appellee: FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, Newport News field office, John/Jane Doe (s) Supervisor Technical agent (s), Acting as a person (s) and member (s) of a criminal enterprise Under Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, Newport News field office, John/Jane Doe (s) Technical agent (s), Acting as a person (s) and member (s) of a criminal enterprise Under Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, Newport News field office, John/Jane Doe (s) Supervisor field agent (s), Acting as a person (s) and member (s) of a criminal enterprise Under Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) and others
Kathy Stratton v. Mecklenburg County
as 13-1095
Plaintiff: JACK STRATTON
Defendant - Appellee: MECKLENBURG COUNTY, RICHARD JACOBSEN, TYRONE WADE and others
Movant - Appellant: KATHY STRATTON, on behalf of the Estate of Jack Stratton, plaintiff
Kathy Stratton v. Mecklenburg County
as 12-1625
Plaintiff: JACK STRATTON
Movant - Appellant: KATHY STRATTON, on behalf of the Estate of Jack Stratton, plaintiff
Defendant - Appellee: MECKLENBURG COUNTY, RICHARD JACOBSEN, TYRONE WADE and others
Pepi Schafler v. Scott Field We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-1430
Plaintiff - Appellant: PEPI SCHAFLER
Defendant - Appellee: SCOTT D. FIELD, Esq., KENNETH OESTREICHER, Esq., REZNICK FEDDER & SILVERMAN and others
Bizzie Walters v. Todd McMahen We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-1796
Plaintiff - Appellant: BIZZIE WALTERS, ANNIE HODGE, ANNETTE BALDWIN and others
Defendant - Appellee: TODD MCMAHEN, TOL DOZIER, NANCY HOLLIS and others
Defendant: ELANA ASYN, EMPERATRIZ PLOALA BEATTY, SANDRA HERRERA and others
Movant - Appellee: PERDUE FARMS, INCORPORATED
Bluemark, Inc. v. Geeks On Call Holdings, Inc.
as 10-1382
Plaintiff - Appellant: BLUEMARK, INC.
Defendant - Appellee: GEEKS ON CALL HOLDINGS, INC., GEEKS ON CALL AMERICA, INC., RICHARD T. COLE and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?