Cases 11 - 20 of 132
Commonwealth of Virginia v. Lucas Vinyard
as 21-4589
Plaintiff / Appellant:
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
Defendant / Appellee:
LUCAS VINYARD
Commonwealth of Virginia v. Alejandro Amaya
as 21-2229
Plaintiff / Appellant:
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
Defendant / Appellee:
ALEJANDRO AMAYA
Commonwealth of Virginia v. Alejandro Amaya
as 21-4584
Plaintiff / Appellant:
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
Defendant / Appellee:
ALEJANDRO AMAYA
Bryant Parker v. Director of the Virginia Dept. of Corrections
as 21-7436
Petitioner / Appellant:
BRYANT MATTHEW PARKER
Respondent / Appellee:
DIRECTOR OF THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
James Tolle v. Ralph Northam
as 21-2106
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES TOLLE
Defendant / Appellee:
GOVERNOR RALPH S. NORTHAM and COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
Michael Berry v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 21-7224
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL ALLEN BERRY
Respondent / Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
Sean Earl v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 21-7154
Petitioner / Appellant:
SEAN S. EARL
Respondent / Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
Durwin Bonds v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 21-7146
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DURWIN EVANT BONDS, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, ROANOKE CITY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, ROANOKE CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Elizabeth Polak v. Virginia Department of Environmental Quality
as 21-1848
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ELIZABETH POLAK, individually and on behalf of persons similarly situated
Plaintiff:
DEBRA TRENT, NICOLE TILLEY, LYNNE E. SMITH and others
Defendant / Appellee:
VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
Interested Party:
VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, VDHRM/COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
Eric Bonetti v. City of Alexandria, Virginia
as 21-1820
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ERIC J. BONETTI
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF ALEXANDRIA, VIRGINIA, ROBERT HILLER MALM, EPISCOPAL DIOCESE OF VIRGINIA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
