Cases 11 - 20 of 1,591
US v. Michael Harriot
as 24-6181
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
MICHAEL OWEN HARRIOT, a/k/a Lanky, a/k/a Donovan Smith, a/k/a Richard Onyett, a/k/a Bernard Barber, a/k/a James D. Smith, a/k/a Michael Smith
Vladimir Kruglyak v. Karen Phoebus
as 24-1156
Plaintiff:
VLADIMIR KRUGLYAK, d/b/a Fruklyak, Inc.
Defendant:
KAREN J. PHOEBUS and HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INCORPORATED
Roland Chalifoux, Jr. v. Wetzel County Hospital, Inc.
as 24-1108
Plaintiff:
ROLAND F. CHALIFOUX, JR., D.O.
Defendant:
WETZEL COUNTY HOSPITAL, INC., WEST VIRGINIA UNITED HEALTH SYSTEM, INCORPORATED, d/b/a West Virginia University Health System, d/b/a WVU Health System, DONALD BLUM, M.D. and others
US v. Anthony Williams
as 24-4043
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ANTHONY D. WILLIAMS, a/k/a Ray L. Dixon
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Thomas Patterson
as 24-1068
Plaintiff:
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC.
Defendant:
THOMAS W. PATTERSON, PATRICIA PATTERSON and PATTERSON CAPITAL INVESTMENTS LLC, d/b/a Time Out Tavern
S & D Coal Company v. DOWCP
as 24-1026
Petitioner:
S & D COAL COMPANY and TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY
Respondent:
DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and KATHY M. BLACKWELL, on behalf of Lonnie R. Blackwell, and Widow of
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1004
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
US v. Melvin Samuels
as 23-7237
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MELVIN D. SAMUELS
Employer-Teamsters Local Nos. 175 and 505 Pension v. Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation
as 23-2213
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EMPLOYER-TEAMSTERS LOCAL NOS. 175 AND 505 PENSION TRUST FUND and UNIFORMED SANITATIONMEN'S LOCAL 831 COMPENSATION ACCRUAL FUND, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Plaintiff:
JEREMY A. LANGLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON HOLDING CORPORATION, HORACIO D. ROZANSKI, LLOYD W. HOWELL, JR. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
