Cases 41 - 50 of 117
Charles Kable, IV v. Anas Elhady
as 20-154
Respondent:
MICHAEL EDMUND COLEMAN, MUHAMMAD YAHYA KHAN, JOHN DOE, No. 4 and others
Petitioner:
CHARLES H. KABLE, IV, Director of the Terrorist Screening Center, in his official capacity, NICHOLAS J. RASMUSSEN, Director of the National Counterterrorism Center in his official capacity, KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, Acting Commissioner of United States Customs and Border Protection in his official capacity and others
US v. Devon Coleman
as 20-4093
Defendant / Appellant:
DEVON SCOTT COLEMAN, a/k/a Cuz, a/k/a Devin Scott Coleman
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Anas Elhady v. Charles Kable
as 20-1119
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SAMIR ANWAR, WAEL HAKMEH, MURAT FRLJUCKIE and others
Defendant / Appellant:
KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, Acting Commissioner of United States Customs and Border Protection in his official capacity, CHARLES H. KABLE, IV, Director of the Terrorist Screening Center, in his official capacity, NICHOLAS J. RASMUSSEN, Director of the National Counterterrorism Center in his official capacity and others
US v. Dominick Coleman
as 20-4084
Defendant / Appellant:
DOMINICK RANDELL COLEMAN, a/k/a D
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Brenda Gillis v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage
as 20-1047
Defendant / Appellee:
MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS MERS, INC., THE LAW OFFICE OF SAMUEL I. WHITE PC, WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE, d/b/a America's Servicing Company, a division of Wells Fargo Bank, NA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRENDA COLEMAN GILLIS
US v. Jeffrey Coleman
as 20-4042
Defendant / Appellant:
JEFFREY LEVAN COLEMAN
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
US v. Paul Coleman
as 19-7878
Defendant / Appellant:
PAUL BERNARD COLEMAN
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
David Meyers v. Officer Baker
as 19-7844
Defendant / Appellee:
B. MORGAN, NURSE SCALF, J. ELY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
