Other Statutes Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Cases 41 - 50 of 631
US v. Gregory Daniels
as 22-6181
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: GREGORY DANIELS
US v. Daniel Rowland
as 22-4076
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: DANIEL EUGENE ROWLAND
US v. Daniel Critchfield
as 22-4063
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: DANIEL PORTER CRITCHFIELD
US v. Daniel King
as 22-6087
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: DANIEL LLOYD AVERY KING
US v. Daniel Stone
as 21-7738
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: DANIEL AARON STONE
Daniel Tekle v. Ms. DaWalt
as 21-7736
Plaintiff / Appellant: DANIEL TEKLE
Defendant / Appellee: MS. DAWALT and MS. ANDREA LAYMON
Brian Mahoney v. Warden Daniel Martin
as 21-7666
Petitioner / Appellant: BRIAN EDWARD MAHONEY
Respondent / Appellee: WARDEN DANIEL MARTIN and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Daniel Parsons v. Warden Hawkins
as 21-7611
Plaintiff / Appellant: DANIEL B. PARSONS
Defendant / Appellee: WARDEN HAWKINS, CAROLINE FLEMING, CRISTEL VAUGHAN and others
Defendant: GOVERNOR ROY COOPER, DIRECTOR TODD E. ISHEE and KIMBERLY D. GRANDE, Grievance Examiner
G.T. v. The Board of Education of the County of Kanawha
as 21-2286
Plaintiff / Appellee: G.T., by his parents, MICHELLE, JAMIE T., on behalf of himself and all similarly situated individuals and others
Defendant / Appellant: THE BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE COUNTY OF KANAWHA
Defendant: KANAWHA COUNTY SCHOOLS and RON DUERRING, Superintendent, Kanawha County Schools, in his official capacity
Agile Infrastructure Services LLC v. Carla Morse
as 21-2285
Plaintiff / Appellee: AGILE INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES LLC
Defendant / Appellant: CARLA MORSE and IMAGES, INC.
Defendant: DANIEL LEE, MICHELLE LEE and CLC FAMILY HOLDINGS, INC.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?