Cases 41 - 50 of 115
Desmond Ndambi v. CoreCivic, Inc.
as 19-2207
Plaintiff:
BOKOLE UMBA DIEU, HONORE OTAYEMA RECINOS, IVAN CHACON CHACON and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MBAH EMMANUEL ABI, DESMOND NDAMBI and NKEMTOH MOSES AWOMBANG, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
CORECIVIC, INC.
Jose Ramirez-Serpas v. William Barr
as 19-2087
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Petitioner:
JOSE RAMIREZ-SERPAS
Sandra Ramirez v. Volvo Group North America
as 19-2023
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SANDRA RAMIREZ
Defendant / Appellee:
VOLVO GROUP NORTH AMERICA MEDICAL PLAN
Defendant:
VOLVO IR BLAW KNOX BASE MAJOR MEDICAL INDEMNITY RETIREMENT PLAN
US v. Cesar Sierro-Pineda
as 19-7225
Defendant / Appellant:
CESAR SIERRO-PINEDA, a/k/a Desiderio Ramirez Duarte, a/k/a Desiderio Pineda Duarte
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Ubaldo Ramirez v. Larry Rabon
as 19-6661
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL BUNNELL, RN Public Health, LARRY RABON, MD (UCAC), CHRISTOPHER DAVIS, Public Health (APRN/FNP-C) and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UBALDO ARRIAGA RAMIREZ
US v. Arturo Ramirez
as 17-4644
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ARTURO LUCIANO RAMIREZ
US v. Jesus Rojas-Quintana
as 17-4522
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JESUS ROJAS-QUINTANA, a/k/a Moises Acosta, a/k/a Moises Cano-Acosta, a/k/a Cruz Ramirez-Acosta
US v. Omar Ramirez-Ramo
as 17-4464
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
OMAR ABISAI RAMIREZ-RAMOS
Alvaro Ramirez Castaneda v. Jefferson B. Sessions III
as 17-1630
Petitioner:
ALVARO EZEQUIEL RAMIREZ CASTANEDA, a/k/a Avardo Ramirez, a/k/a Alvaro Castaneda Ramirez
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, U.S. Attorney General
US v. Darra Shephard
as 17-4148
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DARRA LEE SHEPHARD, a/k/a Nora Southerland, a/k/a Donna Ramirez
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.