Cases 1 - 10 of 63
Progressive Direct Insurance Company v. Lynn Freeman
as 24-177
Petitioner:
PROGRESSIVE DIRECT INSURANCE COMPANY
Respondent:
LYNN FREEMAN, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated
US v. Brett Freeman
as 23-4120
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
BRETT LEONZA FREEMAN
US v. Johney Freeman
as 22-6921
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JOHNEY FREEMAN
William Thorpe v. Harold Clarke
as 21-1714
Defendant / Appellant:
H. S. RICHESON, TORI RAIFORD, HAROLD CLARKE and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STEVEN RIDDICK, GARY WALL, KEVIN SNODGRASS, JR. and others
Defendant:
VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Fred Freeman v. Director Stirling
as 21-6880
Defendant / Appellee:
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DIRECTOR STIRLING, WARDEN DAVIS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FRED FREEMAN
James Freeman v. SAIC
as 20-2371
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES FREEMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, a/k/a SAIC
William Dawson v. Donald Hicks
as 20-7916
Defendant / Appellee:
CRAVEN COUNTY, DONALD C. HICKS, Craven County D.A. and J. RAY FREEMAN, Craven County Sheriff Department
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM DAWSON
Devon Gayles v. State of North Carolina Inc.
as 20-7842
Defendant / Appellee:
GARY G. HOSBEIN, Esquire, DENNIS M. WILEY, Magistrate, WARREN G. CLARK, District Executive and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEVON ARMOND GAYLES, a/k/a Devon A. Gayles El, In propria persona, proceeding sui juris, Moorish American National All Rights Reserved Ex rel
Elizabeth Fedynich v. Boulder Housing Partners
as 20-2082
Defendant / Appellee:
CARRIE SCHMIDT, HUD, DAWN FAGAN, Executive Director, LRHA, WILMA HENRY, Porfolio Management Specialist, HUD and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NICOLE FEDYNICH and ELIZABETH FEDYNICH
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.