Cases 1 - 10 of 13
US v. Joseph Hobbs
as 24-4301
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
JOSEPH HERBERT HOBBS, a/k/a Joe
US v. Daquan Hobbs
as 22-4126
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DAQUAN HOBBS
Tony Messer v. Bristol Compressors International, LLC
as 21-2363
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TONY A. MESSER, PHILIP E. BARBROW, BENJIE G. HICKS and others
Defendant / Appellee:
BRISTOL COMPRESSOR, INCORPORATED, trading as Bristol Compressors
Defendant:
GARRISON INVESTMENT GROUP, LP
Robert Dougherty v. Dana Lawhorne
as 19-7835
Defendant / Appellee:
T. L. CRICKEMBERGER, Hearing Officer (of record), Coffewood Correctional Center, M.S. KIMBERLY TUCKER, Grievance Officer, Coffewood Correctional Center, WENDY S. HOBBS, Regional Administrator Grievances, Virginia Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT W. DOUGHERTY
US v. Julius Hobbs
as 19-7486
Defendant / Appellant:
JULIUS DESHAWN HOBBS
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Alexia Burno-Whalen v. The State of Maryland
as 19-2089
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALEXIA BURNO-WHALEN
Defendant / Appellee:
TROOPER R. HOBBS, THE STATE OF MARYLAND and TROOPER OLIVER OKAFOR
Walter Booker v. R. Timmons
as 19-7012
Defendant / Appellee:
LIEUTENANT TAYLOR, R. TIMMONS, Unit Manager, T. ROBINSON, Sergeant and others
Defendant:
S. TAPP, Human Rights Advocate, J. HARRIS, Warden, D. DUGGER, Institutional Hearings Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WALTER D. BOOKER
Robert Dougherty v. Dana Lawhorne
as 19-6964
Defendant / Appellee:
T. L. CRICKEMBERGER, Hearing Officer (of record), Coffewood Correctional Center, M.S. KIMBERLY TUCKER, Grievance Officer, Coffewood Correctional Center, WENDY S. HOBBS, Regional Administrator Grievances, Virginia Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT W. DOUGHERTY
US v. Erick Hobbs
as 19-4419
Defendant / Appellant:
ERICK RAHUMID HOBBS
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
