Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Tommy Robinson v. Warden Richard Graham, Jr.
as 19-6355
Defendant / Appellee:
CAPTAIN GORDON, SECURITY CHIEF BUTLER, ASSISTANT WARDEN WEBER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TOMMY RAY ROBINSON
Defendant:
KIMBERLY MARTIN
US v. Jerome Whiteside
as 19-4089
Defendant / Appellant:
JEROME NICHOLAS WHITESIDE
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
US v. Robert Whiteside
as 16-4372
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ROBERT EDWARD WHITESIDE
United States ex rel. Michaels v. Agape Senior Community, Inc.
as 15-2145
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA EX REL BRIANNA MICHAELS AND AMY WHITESIDES
Defendant - Appellee:
AGAPE SENIOR COMMUNITY, INCORPORATED, AGAPE SENIOR PRIMARY CARE, INC., AGAPE SENIOR SERVICES, INCORPORATED and others
Intervenor - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States ex rel. Michaels v. Agape Senior Community, Inc.
as 15-2147
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA EX REL BRIANNA MICHAELS AND AMY WHITESIDES
Defendant - Appellant:
AGAPE SENIOR COMMUNITY, INCORPORATED, AGAPE SENIOR PRIMARY CARE, INC., AGAPE SENIOR SERVICES, INCORPORATED and others
Intervenor - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Agape Senior Community, Inc. v. United States ex rel. Michael
as 15-239
Petitioner:
AGAPE SENIOR COMMUNITY, INCORPORATED, AGAPE SENIOR PRIMARY CARE, INC., AGAPE SENIOR SERVICES, INCORPORATED and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA EX REL BRIANNA MICHAELS AND AMY WHITESIDES
:
United States ex rel. Michaels v. Agape Senior Community, Inc.
as 15-238
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA EX REL BRIANNA MICHAELS AND AMY WHITESIDES
Respondent:
AGAPE SENIOR COMMUNITY, INCORPORATED, AGAPE SENIOR PRIMARY CARE, INC., AGAPE SENIOR SERVICES, INCORPORATED and others
:
US v. Andre Whiteside
as 15-6985
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ANDRE BERNARD WHITESIDE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
