Cases 1 - 10 of 2,469
Amy Bryant v. William Brawley
as 24-1600
Defendant:
WILLIAM M. BRAWLEY, in his official capacity as a member of the North Carolina Medical Board, KODY H. KINSLEY, in his official capacity as the North Carolina Secretary of Health and Human Services, PHD MICHAUX R. KILPATRICK, M.D. and others
Intervenor:
TIMOTHY K. MOORE and PHILIP E. BERGER
Plaintiff:
AMY BRYANT, M.D.
Amicus Curiae:
FAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL, CONCERNED WOMEN FOR AMERICA, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA and others
Amy Bryant v. Joshua Stein
as 24-1617
Defendant:
WILLIAM M. BRAWLEY, in his official capacity as a member of the North Carolina Medical Board, PHD MICHAUX R. KILPATRICK, M.D., KODY H. KINSLEY, in his official capacity as the North Carolina Secretary of Health and Human Services and others
Plaintiff:
AMY BRYANT, M.D.
Intervenor:
TIMOTHY K. MOORE and PHILIP E. BERGER
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF FLORIDA, CONCERNED WOMEN FOR AMERICA, FAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL and others
Amy Bryant v. Timothy Moore
as 24-1576
Defendant:
PHD, FNP-BC SHARONA Y. JOHNSON, WILLIAM M. BRAWLEY, in his official capacity as a member of the North Carolina Medical Board, JD JOSHUA D. MALCOLM, in his official capacity as a member of the North Carolina Medical Board and others
Intervenor:
TIMOTHY K. MOORE and PHILIP E. BERGER
Plaintiff:
AMY BRYANT, M.D.
Amicus Curiae:
AMERICAN CENTER FOR LAW AND JUSTICE, NC VALUES INSTITUTE, FAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL and others
US v. Dion Camp
as 24-4401
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
DION LAMONT CAMP, a/k/a Myles Camp, a/k/a Brian Williams, a/k/a Myles Elameen, a/k/a Shavoo Elameen, a/k/a Myles Campbell
US v. Christopher Williams
as 24-4372
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER MONTRELL WILLIAMS
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
US v. Kevin Dukes
as 24-4339
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
KEVIN WILLIAM DUKES, a/k/a KD
US v. William Waters
as 24-4327
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
WILLIAM WATERS, a/k/a Brew
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
