Cases 11 - 16 of 16
Richard Bell v. Magnum Land Services, LLC
as 14-2239
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD BELL, husband, JACQUELINE BELL, wife, DELBERT C. BELL and others
Defendant - Appellee:
MAGNUM LAND SERVICES, LLC, a Michigan limited liability company, BELMONT RESOURCES, LLC, a Michigan limited liability company and ENERPLUS RESOURCES (USA) CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation
Defendant:
DAVID A. SCHRIML, an individual and JOHN DOES 1-10, unidentified individuals
Barbara Pitkin v. Ocwen Financial Corporation
as 12-2558
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BARBARA PITKIN
Defendant - Appellee:
OCWEN FINANCIAL CORPORATION, OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC, As Servicer, ACE SECURITIES CORPORATION, As Depositor and others
Margaret Fegely v. One West Bank FSB
as 12-2027
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARGARET FEGELY
Defendant - Appellee:
ONE WEST BANK FSB, INDYMAC MORTGAGE SERVICER, HOME LOAN CENTER INCORPORATED and others
John Manley v. John Doe
as 12-1286
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN D. MANLEY and KAREN MANLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN DOE, WENDY'S INTERNATIONAL, INCORPORATED and FIRST SUN MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, d/b/a Wendys
Mark Davis v. Mike Rutherford
as 10-1091
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MARK E. DAVIS and TAMMY L. DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
REO AMERICA, INCORPORATED, a Florida corporation, and any and all persons and REBUILD AMERICA, INCORPORATED, a Florica Corporation
Defendant:
MIKE RUTHERFORD, Sheriff of Kanawha County, VERA MCCORMICK, Clerk of the County Commission of Kanawha County and 100 JOHN DOES, having or claiming any interest in real estate identified as 51 Woodbridge Drive, Charleston, West Virginia
Movant - Appellant:
HUNTINGTON NATIONAL BANK, N.A.
East TN Natural Gas v. Thomas
as 07-1443
Plaintiff - Appellee:
EAST TENNESSEE NATURAL GAS COMPANY
Defendant - Appellant:
JERRY S. THOMAS
Defendant:
3.04 ACRES IN PATRICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA, BETTY B. THOMAS, C. JERRY LOVE, Commissioner of Revenue and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
