Cases 41 - 50 of 92
Hunter Laboratories, ex rel v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 15-1484
Plaintiff - Appellant:
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA EX REL HUNTER LABORATORIES, LLC and COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA EX REL CHRIS RIEDEL, an individual
Plaintiff - Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
Defendant:
LABORATORY CORPORATION OF AMERICA, a Delaware corporation, LABORATORY CORPORATION OF AMERICA HOLDINGS, a Delaware corporation, DOES 10 THROUGH 100, INCLUSIVE and others
Jane Doe #1 v. Matt Blair
as 15-1211
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JANE DOE 1, a minor, by her next friends and guardians, Ben and Kelly Houdersheldt, BEN HOUDERSHELDT, KELLY HOUDERSHELDT and others
Defendant - Appellant:
MATT BLAIR, an individual
Defendant:
RES-CARE, INCORPORATED, a foreign company
Jane Doe v. Aaron Smith
as 15-1023
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JANE DOE, a fictitious name for a real person
Defendant - Appellant:
AARON ALEXANDER SMITH
Potenciano Aggarao, Jr. v. Mol Ship Management Company
as 14-1928
Plaintiff - Appellee:
POTENCIANO L. AGGARAO, JR.
Defendant - Appellant:
MOL SHIP MANAGEMENT COMPANY, LTD., NISSAN MOTOR CAR CARRIER COMPANY, LTD., trading as Nissan Carrier Fleet and WORLD CAR CARRIERS, INCORPORATED
Defendant:
MITSUI O.S.K. LINES, LTD., trading as Mol, WORLD MARINE COMPANY, LTD., JOHN DOE A and others
Estela Lebron v. Donald Rumsfeld
as 11-6480
Amicus Curiae:
CHARLES OTSTOTT, Lieutenant General, USA (Ret.), EUGENE R. FIDELL, Lieutenant Commander, USCG (Ret.), UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ESTELA LEBRON, for herself and as Mother and Next Friend of Jose Padilla and JOSE PADILLA
Defendant / Appellee:
CATHERINE T. HANFT, Former Commander Consolidated Brig, MELANIE A. MARR, Former Commander Consolidated Brig, DONALD H. RUMSFELD, Former Secretary of Defense and others
Defendant:
CRAIG NOBLE, Dr., MACK D. KEEN, Senior Chief Consolidated Brig, JOHN D. ASHCROFT, Former Attorney General and others
Narseal Batiste v. Federal Bureau of Prison
as 14-7231
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NARSEAL BATISTE
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, et. al., JOEL ZIEGLER, Warden, FCI Beckley, officially and in his individual capacity, DR. DOMINICK MCLAIN, D.O. Clinical Director, officially and in his individual capacity and others
Doe 2 v. John Rosa
as 14-1748
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN DOE 2
Defendant - Appellee:
PRESIDENT JOHN W. ROSA, individually
Mother Doe v. John Rosa
as 14-1749
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MOTHER DOE, on behalf of John Doe 3
Defendant - Appellant:
PRESIDENT JOHN W. ROSA, individually
Commonwealth of VA ex rel v. Laboratory Corporation
as 14-1625
Plaintiff - Appellant:
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA EX REL HUNTER LABORATORIES, LLC and COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA EX REL CHRIS RIEDEL, an individual
Defendant - Appellee:
LABORATORY CORPORATION OF AMERICA, a Delaware corporation and LABORATORY CORPORATION OF AMERICA HOLDINGS, a Delaware corporation
Defendant:
DOES 10 THROUGH 100, INCLUSIVE, QUEST DIAGNOSTICS, INCORPORATED, a Delaware corporation, QUEST DIAGNOSTICS NICHOLS INSTITUTE, f/k/a Quest Diagnostics, Incorporated, a California corporation and others
Cargotec OYJ v. MOL Ship Management, Co., Ltd.
as 14-1571
Plaintiff - Appellee:
POTENCIANO L. AGGARAO, JR.
Defendant - Appellant:
CARGOTEC USA INCORPORATED, trading as Cargotec USA, a corporate fictitious name, CARGOTEC OYG, a Finnish public limited company, CARGOTEC SWEDEN, A.B., f/k/a MacGregor Group AB, a wholly owned subsidiary of Cargotec OYJ and others
Defendant:
CARGOTEC SWITZERLAND S.A., trading as Cargotec, a U.S. Registered Trademark (wordmark), MACGREGOR-NAVIRE INTERNATIONAL AB (SWEDEN), trading as MacGregor-Navire, a U.S. Registered Trademark (service mark), MACGREGOR-NAVIRE INTERNATIONAL AKTIEBOLAG JOINT STOCK COMPANY, trading as MacGregor-Navire, a U.S. Registered Trademark (wordmark) and others
Third Party Plaintiff:
WORLD CAR CARRIERS, INCORPORATED
Third Party Defendant:
MOL SHIP MANAGEMENT COMPANY, LTD. and NISSAN MOTOR CAR CARRIER COMPANY, LTD.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
