Torts - Injury Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
William Pumphrey v. Joe Coakley We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-2052
Plaintiff - Appellant: WILLIAM C. PUMPHREY
Defendant - Appellee: JOE COAKLEY, O. OFFICER GIBSON, J. D. JAMES and others
Party-in-Interest: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Steven N. Fulton v. Isaac Coleman We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-1892
Plaintiff - Appellant: STEVEN N. FULTON
Defendant - Appellee: ISAAC HANNAH COLEMAN, NEW ENGLAND MOTOR FREIGHT, ABC CORPORATION and others
Kevin Harper v. CBS Corporation
as 14-2271
Plaintiff - Appellant: KEVIN HARPER, Kevin Harper Personal Representative of the Estate of Claude Alvin Harper, Deceased and Surviving Son of Claude Alvin Harper, Deceased, CAROL JOHNSON HARPER, Use Plaintiff and Surviving Widow of Claude Alvin Harper, Deceased, ALEX HARPER, Surviving Son of Claude Alvin Harper, Deceased and others
Plaintiff: CLAUDE A. HARPER
Defendant - Appellee: CBS CORPORATION, f/k/a Westinghouse, FOSTER WHEELER CORPORATION, GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY and others
Defendant: ALLTITE GASKETS, ANCHOR PACKING COMPANY, A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY and others
Darryl McKenzie v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.
as 11-1365
Plaintiff - Appellant: DARRYL MCKENZIE, MORRIS LAWN AND LANDSCAPE, TIMOTHY ARD and others
Petitioner: CHRISTY T. DALTON
Movant - Appellant: WILLIAM HALL, DAISIAH WHACK, through her Guardian ad Litem Darlene Champagne Guardian ad Litem Darlene Champagne, ROOSEVELT WALKER and others
Movant: ROBERT M. BELL, ERWIN LEIZERMAN, MICHAEL J. LEIZERMAN and others
Defendant - Appellee: NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Defendant: NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION and JOHN DOES 1-10
Jessica Curtis v. Norfolk Southern Railway Compa We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-1829
Plaintiff - Appellant: JESSICA CURTIS, TIMOTHY ARD, JAMES SPLAWN and others
Petitioner: CHRISTY T. DALTON
Movant - Appellant: DW, through her Guardian ad Litem Darlene Champagne; Guardian ad Litem Darlene Champagne, WILLIAM HALL, ROOSEVELT WALKER and others
Movant: ROBERT M. BELL, ERWIN LEIZERMAN, MICHAEL J. LEIZERMAN and others
Defendant - Appellee: NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Defendant: NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION and JOHN DOES 1-10
Elizabeth Cutright v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.
as 10-1559
Plaintiff - Appellant: ELIZABETH R. CUTRIGHT, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated
Plaintiff: TINA BEVINGTON, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, JESSICA CURTIS, TIMOTHY ARD and others
Petitioner: CHRISTY T. DALTON
Movant: ROBERT M. BELL, ERWIN LEIZERMAN, MICHAEL J. LEIZERMAN and others
Defendant - Appellee: NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Defendant: NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION and JOHN DOES 1-10, Norfolk Southern Railway Crewmembers and Residents of South Carolina
Christy Dalton v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.
as 09-2366
Petitioner - Appellant: CHRISTY T. DALTON
Plaintiff: ELIZABETH R. CUTRIGHT, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, TINA BEVINGTON, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, JESSICA CURTIS and others
Defendant - Appellee: NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Defendant - None: NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION and JOHN DOES 1-10
Movant - None: ROOSEVELT WALKER, DW, through her Guardian ad Litem Darlene Champagne; Guardian ad Litem Darlene Champagne, WILLIAM HALL and others
Christy Dalton v. Norfolk Southern Corporation
as 09-2367
Plaintiff - Appellant: CHRISTY T. DALTON
Plaintiff: ELIZABETH R. CUTRIGHT, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, JOHN C. BEVINGTON, JESSICA CURTIS and others
Defendant - Appellee: NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION
Defendant - None: JOHN DOES 1-10
Charles Coleman v. US We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-1039
Plaintiff - Appellant: CHARLES WILLIAM COLEMAN
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and SHADE TREE LAWN CARE, INCORPORATED

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?