Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Faye Hayes v. Maryland Transit Administration
as 24-1504
Plaintiff:
FAYE BEATRICE HAYES
Defendant:
MARYLAND TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION, HOLLY ARNOLD, Administrator, MDOT MTA and VERONICA LOWE, Deputy Director, Office of Labor and Employee Relations
Estate of Trina L. Cunningham v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore
as 23-1467
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THE ESTATE OF TRINA L. CUNNINGHAM, Personal Representative Towanda Grant-Cunningham, TOWANDA GRANT-CUNNINGHAM, FAITH CUNNINGHAM and others
Defendant / Appellee:
MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE, BALTIMORE CITY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS, RUDY CHOW, Director, Individually and in official capacity and others
Chen Bing v. Joseph Biden, Jr.
as 22-1424
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHEN BING and BING CHEN
Defendant / Appellee:
JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., in his official capacity as the President of the United States, MICHAEL R. POMPEO, in his former official capacity as Secretary of State, ANTONY J. BLINKEN, in his official capacity as Secretary of State and others
Cheryl Pauley v. Brian Noran
as 22-1036
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHERYL A. PAULEY, on behalf of deceased biological son Tavon Pauley, and others next-of-kin, interested, and similarly situated, and friend of this court, et al.
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIAN NORAN, Virginia Secretary of Public Safety, subordinates, subsidiaries, et al., HAROLD W. CLARKE, VDOC's Director, Subordinates, Subsidiaries, et al. and DR. STEVE HERRICK, VDOC Offender Health Services Director, Subordinates, and medical units levels 1 to 6 subsidiaries, et al.
Jeffrey Rockman v. Union Carbide Corporation
as 17-1883
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY ROCKMAN and SONJA ROCKMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION, KAISER GYPSUM COMPANY, INC. and GEORGIA-PACIFIC, LLC
Defendant:
JOHN CRANE-HOUDAILLE, INCORPORATED, E.L. STEBBING & COMPANY, INCORPORATED, HAMPSHIRE INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED, f/k/a John H. Hampshire Co. and others
Doreen Shing v. MD Developmental Disabilitie
as 17-1579
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DOREEN SHING and MAY SHING
Defendant - Appellee:
MD DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES ADMINISTRATION, MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND MENTAL HYGIENE and BUDGET AND EXPENDITURES DIRECTOR
Wayne Oliver v. The Walter E. Campbell Company
as 16-1895
Plaintiff - Appellee:
WAYNE OLIVER
Defendant - Appellee:
THE WALTER E. CAMPBELL COMPANY, INC.
Defendant And 3rd-Party Plaintiff - Appellant:
CAMPBELL MCCORMICK, INC., and its remaining Director-Trustee, Robert I. McCormick
Defendant And 3rd-Party Plaintiff - Appellee:
MCIC, INCORPORATED, formerly known as McCormick Asbestos Co
Third Party Defendant - Appellee:
ATWOOD & MORRILL CO., INC., MANVILLE TRUST PERSONAL INJURY SETTLEMENT TRUST, AURORA PUMP, CO and others
Janya Sawyer v. Foster Wheeler LLC
as 16-1530
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JANYA SAWYER, Representative of the Estate of Joseph W. Morris, GARNETTE MORRIS, Individually and as Surviving Spouse of Joseph W. Morris, NANCY PIKE, Surviving Child of Joseph W. Morris and others
Defendant - Appellant:
FOSTER WHEELER LLC
Defendant:
UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION, JOHN CRANE-HOUDAILLE, INCORPORATED, f/k/a Crane Packing Company, OWENS-ILLINOIS GLASS COMPANY, f/k/a Owens-Illinois, Incorporated and others
Third Party Defendant:
GENERAL REFRACTORIES COMPANY, A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, MANVILLE TRUST PERSONAL INJURY SETTLEMENT TRUST and others
Joyce Barlow v. Colgate Palmolive Company
as 15-2248
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JOYCE BARLOW
Defendant - Appellant:
COLGATE PALMOLIVE COMPANY
Defendant:
JOHN CRANE-HOUDAILLE, INCORPORATED, E.L. STEBBING & COMPANY, INCORPORATED, HAMPSHIRE INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED, f/k/a John H. Hampshire Company and others
Clara Mosko v. Colgate Palmolive Company
as 15-2252
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CLARA G. MOSKO
Defendant - Appellant:
COLGATE PALMOLIVE COMPANY
Defendant:
JOHN CRANE-HOUDAILLE, INCORPORATED, E.L. STEBBING & COMPANY, INCORPORATED, HAMPSHIRE INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED, f/k/a John H. Hampshire Company and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
